Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TBBT

He is making the case that a lot of folks have accepted or reached on their own - that given the available options, Newt’s moving Clinton and the nation right during the 90’s (along with the idea of him debating the teleprompter) are why many consider him the best option.

I would imagine many Newt supporters would like to support Perry, but just cannot get over the cringe factor of another guy from Texas who gives us ulcers on debate days. And the upcoming debates will likely be incredibly important, moreso than ever before.

I am betting there are a fair number of folks who are Newt and Perry in that order - folks who actually may agree more with Santorum or Bachmann but don’t buy either as prime time material.

Just a tea leaf reading based on Erickson’s comments.


13 posted on 12/27/2011 8:17:29 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

Bingo on all counts!


16 posted on 12/27/2011 8:31:51 PM PST by CainConservative (Merry CHRISTmas and a Happy Newt/Marco 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Well said!


29 posted on 12/27/2011 10:21:36 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

“I would imagine many Newt supporters would like to support Perry, but just cannot get over the cringe factor of another guy from Texas who gives us ulcers on debate days.”

There it is.


46 posted on 12/28/2011 11:29:49 PM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson