Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There is a 'Ronald Reagan' Candidate in the Republican Primary, Rick Santorum
Catholic Online ^ | 12/28/11 | Keith A Fournier

Posted on 12/28/2011 4:41:58 PM PST by tcg

There is a "Ronald Reagan" candidate in the Republican primary.He "squares the circle". He is morally consistent and politically courageous. His name is Rick Santorum. I have written extensively about his positions. I know him, his wife and their family - personally. I have followed him throughout this campaign. He is exactly what many people - just like me - have been hoping for. He is the "Reagan candidate" for the 2012 campaign - and much more. This man is the "real deal", in every way....

(Excerpt) Read more at catholic.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: campaign2012; conservative; iowa; ricksantorum; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: iowamark

If RS does well in Iowa - we’ll see how well he does in the top tier. He may surprise me, but I suppose not so well.


21 posted on 12/28/2011 5:37:21 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tcg

I like Rick Santorum a lot, but I doubt I’ll see another Ronald Reagan in my lifetime. He is easily the best President of the 20th century.


22 posted on 12/28/2011 5:40:08 PM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcg

RE: There is a ‘Ronald Reagan’ Candidate in the Republican Primary, Rick Santorum ...

...and unfortunately he is running for vice president.


23 posted on 12/28/2011 5:42:50 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung

Newt Gingrich is the “Ronald Reagan” conservative of this campaign. Like Reagan, he is a true conservative thinker who developed conservative philosophy and produced a body of work to back it up.


24 posted on 12/28/2011 5:44:07 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Yeah, I’m working on the same model for the 46 counties in SC that I used for the 99 Counties in IA.

Huckabee/Thompson dominated NW South Carolina and the Bible Belt, with McCain running respectable, and Romney tanking in that area. McCain and Romney ran better along the I-95 corridor and in and around Columbia, although Romney never performed well in any area, including the more “moderate” areas.

What put McCain over the top though was the military veterans, particularly in Horry County (Myrtle Beach) and Charleston and along the eastern coast. For Romney to have a prayer in SC, he’ll have to win at least 40% in Charleston and 35% in Myrtle Beach AND get at least 20% in every NW County in SC. He might acheive one of those goals, but all three is heavily unlikely even if the conservative base is fractured. These folks may support Perry before they support Romney even in these more “moderate” areas.

The winner of the IA Caucus of the Conservative candidates WILL get a bounce in NW SC just like Huckabee did. And that will be enough to win that state this time around.


25 posted on 12/28/2011 5:53:12 PM PST by parksstp (Articulate Conservatives look for Converts. RINO's look for Democrat Heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Are you saying the folks in SC care at all what Iowa does? Iowa is even more spastic this time around because of the oddity of all the campaigns attacking a single person.

I do not think Iowa will impact SC that much. Huck had decent SC support before Iowa, which I don’t think Santorum does. An Arkansas preacher does better than a slick Pennsylvania politician type in SC.

I think Newt will get a lot of the McCain vote because they are older and they will well remember what Newt did in congress. And he’s polling well there now. Mitt will do what he did in 08 there.

But I don’t see Iowa meaning that much, nor NH, for SC.


26 posted on 12/28/2011 6:00:27 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tcg

Oh please. That is quite a stretch.
If you’re going to pull the Reagan card, Newt was actually part of the Reagan revolution.


27 posted on 12/28/2011 6:05:05 PM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Anyone know what happens if no one gets a majority of the delegates by the time the convention rolls around? Can the 2nd and 3rd place candidates pool their delegates in order to overtake the 1st place candidate?


28 posted on 12/28/2011 6:15:08 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

I think Santorum was part of the Dan Quayle revolution. Good hair, looks younger than his age, and has trouble stringing a sentence together without tripping all over himself.


29 posted on 12/28/2011 6:16:46 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
But I don’t see Iowa meaning that much, nor NH, for SC.

I agree. Iowa has a history of very little relevance for choosing the nominee.

30 posted on 12/28/2011 6:38:31 PM PST by writer33 (Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

31 posted on 12/28/2011 6:43:49 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcg

Isn’t there some buzz that Santorum is yet another “native born” citizen, something about his parents not being citizens until after his birth??? Don’t want to go thru’ all that anchor baby-native born business again with candidates. Rubio and Jindahl are in the same position I hear. Too bad, because I like all three of them. That issue is going to have to be settled once and for all before any Presidential candidacy is accepted. Let’s start by deciding if Obummer, with a British Daddy supposedly, can hold the title three years and counting after his election.


32 posted on 12/28/2011 6:47:43 PM PST by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Let me let you in on a little secret........Santorum has no money, organization and is not registered in most of the other primary states and their deadlines have passed......

( Pssst....Guess what, he is toast....can't win, waste of time. Obama will make Corned Beef out of him.)

But let's all kneejerk ourselves into convulsions and pray for a miracle! Because stupidity seems like it does not matter here anymore.

33 posted on 12/28/2011 6:49:41 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
( Santorum has no money, no organization....Pssst....Guess what, he is toast....can't win, waste of time. Obama will make Corned Beef out of him.)

Probably right. Folks who have no chance, money nor organization camp out in Iowa for the last six weeks and pray for an Iowa miracle. Even if it works for Iowa it doesn't work over all.

34 posted on 12/28/2011 6:57:05 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
" Neither Santorum nor Bachmann has the potential to go anywhere further even if they would win Iowa. Mr. Fournier does not even address this fact. "

Sarah Palin says other wise.
Sarah has gone on record by saying that Rick Santorum can turn this thing around in 30 days, and even though she didn't come out and say it, she said something 2 months back about someone coming from behind besides the current leaders at that time, and that person she was talking about is Rick Santorum.
Rush Limbaugh has been hinting that he likes to see Rick the leader.
35 posted on 12/28/2011 7:04:38 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Yes, indeed, Rick Santorum is our next Ronald Reagan!

It’s about time people caught on!


36 posted on 12/28/2011 7:21:49 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NakedRampage

“he just never gained traction..”

He’s gaining traction NOW!

4 years ago McCain was 23 points behind Huckabee in Iowa, and ended up being the nominee. Santorum is doing BETTER than McCain in Iowa. Hang on to your hat!


37 posted on 12/28/2011 7:25:56 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Shooting for VP since day one?


38 posted on 12/28/2011 7:31:46 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

I donated proudly to Rick earlier today. I truly believe he is the man for the job.


39 posted on 12/28/2011 8:02:57 PM PST by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcg

His father was not a natural born US citizen. Not a problem?


40 posted on 12/28/2011 9:10:07 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Either Obama can beat any GOP candidate or no GOP candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson