Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian Troops Track, Record Video of US Aircraft Carrier
Fars News Agency ^ | 12/29/2011

Posted on 12/29/2011 12:20:41 PM PST by Just4Him

TEHRAN (FNA)- An Iranian vessel and a surveillance plane tracked, photographed and recorded video of a US aircraft carrier during Iran's ongoing navy drill near the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf.

It is not clear what information the Iranian military could gleam from the footage, but it displays Iran's naval power in water.

Iran's Navy Commander Admiral Habibollah Sayyari said the action shows that Iran has "control over the moves by foreign forces" in the area where Tehran is holding a 10-day military exercises.

"An Iranian vessel and surveillance plane have tracked, filmed and photographed a US aircraft carrier as it was entering the Sea of Oman from the Persian Gulf," Sayyari said.

He added that the "foreign fleet will be warned by Iranian forces if it enters the area of the drill."

The Iranian TV showed what appeared to be the reported video.

(Excerpt) Read more at english.farsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/29/2011 12:20:47 PM PST by Just4Him
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

Iran knows that obama lacks the intestinal fortitude to authorize return fire. Zero has already gone on record that he would not authorize nuclear action, even if were were nuked first.

Now be quiet ... he’s trying to putt.


2 posted on 12/29/2011 12:31:03 PM PST by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Ping.


3 posted on 12/29/2011 12:32:37 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him
It is not clear what information the Iranian military could gleam from the footage, but it displays Iran's naval power in water.

It what way does it show their power? It is international waters, if you want to hang out and take pictures of a carrier they aren't going to stop you. Bet their sweet rear end there was a missile or gun trained on them the whole time and if they had given an indication of doing more then taking a picture they would have vanished in a puff of smoke and spray.

The Russian trawlers were always there following the carrier around. It doesn't prove anything. It is when you can make the carrier change course or deny it access to a chunk of water that you show power. Bobbing along in its wake just makes you a pest.
4 posted on 12/29/2011 12:33:41 PM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Your average child has more naval power in his bath tub than the Iranian navy and they know it. This is just a charade to scare the worthless “One”.

It won’t scare our military,That’s for certain.


5 posted on 12/29/2011 12:38:27 PM PST by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP
The Russian trawlers were always there following the carrier around. It doesn't prove anything. It is when you can make the carrier change course or deny it access to a chunk of water that you show power. Bobbing along in its wake just makes you a pest.

I could not agree more. We are dealing with a regime that tries to build such actions into some kind of major achievement or victory.
6 posted on 12/29/2011 12:39:46 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

One other note to the Iranians about showing power. Despite all your threats your own video testifies that a US carrier strike group is still operating off your largest port. It has comparable striking power to your whole air force (Iran has around 90 operational first rate fighters, a Nimitz class has between 80-90) Meanwhile the seas off Norfolk Virginia are relatively free of Iranian Naval vessels. So who is demonstrating power?


7 posted on 12/29/2011 12:40:46 PM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Love it!


8 posted on 12/29/2011 12:42:00 PM PST by Just4Him (Have I now become your enemy because I am telling you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Russians’ claimed they were fishing boats. All you had to do is look at the antenna and tell they weren’t fishing. They tried to interfere with flight operations more than once, until the word came down to ram them and on one occasion we nearly did missing them by feet.


9 posted on 12/29/2011 1:15:19 PM PST by JamesA (You don't have to be big to stand tall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JamesA
All you had to do is look at the antenna and tell they weren’t fishing.

Correct. Anyone with working eyes and common sense knew they were not out there for fish.
10 posted on 12/29/2011 1:20:20 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP
(Iran has around 90 operational first rate fighters, a Nimitz class has between 80-90)

Not all of the aircraft in a CVW are fighters and what is your source for the IIAF strength?

11 posted on 12/29/2011 1:24:06 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Clarification: The IIAF is now known as the IRIAF.


12 posted on 12/29/2011 1:26:17 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
IRIAF? I thought that they had two different designations depending on whether they operated over water or land... SPLASH and SPLAT.
13 posted on 12/29/2011 1:34:41 PM PST by JPG (Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

Maybe they just want some footage of a real naval warship.


14 posted on 12/29/2011 1:36:50 PM PST by kickonly88 (I love fossil fuel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

The Iranians piper cub had an EAT AT ALLAH’S banner flying behind it. They were taking photo’s with a throw away camera bought at 7-11. If the Iranians don’t be careful that drinking a glass of water quote will be saltwater.


15 posted on 12/29/2011 1:56:38 PM PST by spawn44 (NSWWER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Carriers are 1/4 mile long. Getting some grainy long-range footage ain’t exactly counting coup.

Surface your sub in the middle of the battlegroup. Now THAT’S counting coup.

Somehow I don’t imagine that happening though...


16 posted on 12/29/2011 2:50:19 PM PST by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SargeK

It would not have been hard for them to take out the carrier—but it was what would have happened next that kept them from doing such a thing. Maybe that was the whole point. The Iranians are just blowhards.


17 posted on 12/29/2011 3:47:28 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
In the class 1 fighters I included the Mirage, MiG 29 and the 20 or so F14s they can still get into the air. They also have some MiG 21 clones but I didn't think those still belonged in the first rate. Against an FA18 they would be target practice.
18 posted on 12/29/2011 4:05:06 PM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Sadly for Iran, and I use the word “sadly” ironically, it has no real first rate fighters

The old block Mig 29s and the F-14s are no match for F/A-18s. None at all. It will be a 89-0 contest and they wont even knock down one US fighter in air to air

Just like an old block A F-16 from 1976 does not compare to a F-16 E, Block 60, the same holds true for Mig 29

Only the frame may look similar to newer block Mig 29s but the engine, radar, cockpits, performance ceilings etc are all different

It is the same thing as the Su-30s that a lot of the old Soviet clients have and the Su-30MKIs that India has. Similar names but totally different planes

Of course the grand daddy of this example is the venerable F/A-18 itself. The block A/B planes are not even the same planes (effectively) as the newer block E/F planes (Super Hornet). These are two different planes sharing the same name. A Super Hornet would destroy a F/A-18 Block A Hornet in every engagement


19 posted on 12/29/2011 9:30:33 PM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

Every time we transited the Strait of Hormuz, we were overflown by an Iranian P-3. We took pictures of it, it took pictures of us. Business as usual.


20 posted on 12/30/2011 12:43:20 PM PST by tarawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson