Andrea Mitchell Scolds Romney For Negative Super PAC Ads (Don't criticize Andrea's boy)

newsbusters ^ | 12/30/2011 | By Mark Finkelstein

[tobyhill]

Has Andrea Mitchell appointed herself hall monitor of the 2012 elections? On her MSNBC show today, Mitchell asked Mitt Romney whether he had "an apology to make to the voters" for the negative ads against Newt Gingrich being run by Romney-friendly Super PACs.

For good measure, Mitchell scolded: "is that the kind of campaign you want to run: a negative campaign?"

Anyone care to speculate whether, next time Mitchell's granted an interview with Barack Obama, she will similarly scold him for the barrage of negative advertising his campaign will unleash?

ANDREA MITCHELL: Newt Gingrich has tanked, and by all accounts it's because of the Super PAC barrage of ads from both you and some of the other campaigns. But the Super PACs that are supporting Mitt Romney have just been savage against Newt Gingrich. I know you've said you'd go to the Big House if anyone can establish that you were involved, but the fact is it's your former colleagues, your friends, former colleagues contributed anonymously a million dollars. Do you have an apology to make to the voters in Iowas and around the country for the kind of negative advertising that's been run?

[taildragger]

I was refering to Sarah, and as far as Ms Mitchell, I ain’t gonna check, La la la Lola...

[sjm_888]

I know what you mean. Every time I see her name in print or be it on the tube, Rush’s voice comes to mind. You’re not alone!

[sergeantdave]

“So did you disagree with Cain’s kind remarks about Greenspan?”

I have no idea. What “kind” remarks did Mr. Cain make about greenscam?

“Has Greenspan switched parties?”

From what to what?

Greenscam has always been a member of the Wall Street fascist party. If he switched, you tell me what party that thieving pig joined.

If you’re trying to defend that damn, thieving crook, I won’t have a kind ear to your arguments.

Your turn.

[American Constitutionalist]

" Andrea's "boy" (as you say) is Obama AND ONLY OBAMA. Period."

End of story.

Next."


No, not end of story, read the text:


ANDREA MITCHELL: Newt Gingrich has tanked, and by all accounts it's because of the Super PAC barrage of ads from both you and some of the other campaigns. But the Super PACs that are supporting Mitt Romney have just been savage against Newt Gingrich. I know you've said you'd go to the Big House if anyone can establish that you were involved, but the fact is it's your former colleagues, your friends, former colleagues contributed anonymously a million dollars. Do you have an apology to make to the voters in Iowas and around the country for the kind of negative advertising that's been run?"

It's very clear that Andrea Mitchell is sticking up for Newt, could it be that she see's so liberal RINO quality in him ?

[Graewoulf]

” - - - Andrea Mitchell supporting Newt? Puh-leez! What universe would that be in?”

Well, Alan Greenspan is Andrea Mitchell’s husband, and Alan has worked with Newt in the past, and - - - what are friends for, anyway?

BTW, do you REALLY think that Newt would ask Alan to come out of retirement? Maybe Andrea wants to replace Hilly, the current Secretary of Statements? DC is that other, other universe.

[FlyVet]

I've heard Slanderia's own peers refer to her as an "opinion maker". In other words, even they know she's a propagandist.

Matthews, Vanden Heuvel, and the like, along with her, are the most dishonest, disgusting pit vipers in the business.

And they would probably consider that a compliment.

You're welcome, dears. Bless your hearts.

[Pagey]

need to read later BUMP!

[Pagey]

need to read later BUMP!