Good point, Smooth. When I read it I was wondering why no name or email addresses.
It was a Word document attachment to an e-mail. I saw it in the hacked files so I know it’s legit.
Attachments were separated from the e-mails (which are html documents) so that’s one reason among others that it’s hard to always get the context.
It was a Word document attachment to an e-mail. I saw it in the hacked files so I know it’s legit.
Attachments were separated from the e-mails (which are html documents) so that’s one reason among others that it’s hard to always get the context.