[jpsb]

Is there is a difference between being an isolationist and a non interventionist? I do not like Paul on foreign policy but I see him more as a non interventionist then as an isolationist. But considering the debt we are in, I don't see how we can be expected to continue spending our blood and treasury policing the world. Do you disagree?

Also I would like to see Europe more involved in policing the middle east. Islam is in their back yard and a far greater problem for them then for us. Does that make me an isolationist? I don't like it that Paul would it seems stop supporting Israel, or allow Iran to go nuclear he loses me there, but I don't see him as isolationist.

[noinfringers2]

I was looking at Paul months ago in a favorable light. However, as time has been passing I’m seeing him more as a Muslim promoter. I keep wondering where his supporters come from and from where does he get, apparently, loads of funding. One guess would be his funds come from pockets of Soros backed organizations.