Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton for vice president
Washington Post ^ | 01/03/2012 | Suzi Parker

Posted on 01/03/2012 2:50:27 PM PST by presidio9

“We need Hillary in the White House in 2016 or on the ticket in 2012,” an elderly man told Bill Clinton at a recent book signing here. The former president smiled, signed a copy of “Back to Work: Why We Need Smart Government for a Strong Economy,’’ and assured the man he’d let his wife know: “I’ll pass that along to Hillary.”

Arkansas Democrats have been whispering for months that President Barack Obama would be smart to put Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the ticket as vice-president.

After all, it’s no secret Hillary is tired of logging miles as the 67th Secretary of State. She racked up 237,597 miles – as of Dec. 8, the latest date for totals – while visiting 45 countries and logging 506 hours of travel time in 2011. She has already said she doesn’t want a second term as Secretary of State.

When asked about her plans, the former president said, “She’s tired and she wants to come home” and “do the kind of work that I’m doing now.” But, he added, “It’s up to her to come and know what she intends to do.”

So, does that mean anything in particular about the former senator’s future plans? Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor in the Clinton Administration, predicted in “Business Insider” last week that Obama will pick Hillary as vice president in a switcheroo that makes Biden secretary of state – “a position he’s apparently coveted for years,” Reich said. He said his prediction was not, however, based on any insider information.

This was manna for those Hillary supporters who have never abandoned hope that the former first lady

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biden; potus; wickedwitch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: jersey117

ya, put another know nothing person on the ticket , but if they won ,you would have Bill hanging around LOL !!


21 posted on 01/03/2012 3:10:05 PM PST by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

He’s too much of a narcissist to put her on the ticket. It would be more like Hillary winning her first term than obama winning his second. The late night jokes would be brutal. LOL.


22 posted on 01/03/2012 3:12:40 PM PST by jersey117 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I don’t care what people here say. If she is VP in 2012, we will lose.

That depends. If our side screams LEWINSKI-"IS" in the same way we screamed HUSSIEN-WRIGHT-AYERS in 2008, we will lose.

One way or another, the Dems will try to invoke memories of "Clinton's economy" and "the peace and prosperity" of the Clinton years. They just might beat us with that if we don't have answers ready.

23 posted on 01/03/2012 3:25:24 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

All the Democrats need is a graceful way for Biden to exit and Hillary will be the Democratic VP Nominee.

Biden may get sick, want to spend more time with the family or take the Sec. of State job.


24 posted on 01/03/2012 3:32:00 PM PST by trumandogz (If Rick Perry cannot secure his name on the Va. ballot, how could he be trusted to secure America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This would effectively turn Obama into a lame duck placeholder for 2016.

His ego and arrogance couldn’t stand it.


25 posted on 01/03/2012 3:35:12 PM PST by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

If the GOP nominates Newt the Dems will have no choice but to place Hillary in the VP slot.


26 posted on 01/03/2012 3:37:14 PM PST by trumandogz (If Rick Perry cannot secure his name on the Va. ballot, how could he be trusted to secure America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
“She’s tired and she wants to come home” and “do the kind of work that I’m doing now.”

Some jokes just write themselves.......

27 posted on 01/03/2012 3:37:22 PM PST by edpc (Wilby 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

We need to be ready to defend ourselves against “Clinton’s economy” regardless of how things turn out.


28 posted on 01/03/2012 3:40:06 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It will depend on the polling data. If the Dem’s internal polling shows it’s a close race, he’ll stick with Biden and rely on his smear machine to sink the Republican. If the internal polling shows him trailing badly, he may make the change out of desperation.


29 posted on 01/03/2012 3:46:26 PM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Yes, From the person who brought us “Arab Spring” and Democracy to Egypt. NOT!


30 posted on 01/03/2012 3:48:10 PM PST by wetgundog (" Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is no Vice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

“Obviously the elderly man is suffering from senility.”

I would agree with that. Hillary? ... Please!
Mr. Bill would sure love to be back in power again.


31 posted on 01/03/2012 3:49:56 PM PST by Jennikins (We are being ruled, not governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
She is very popular in the general public.

It must be from her "wartime" record of dodging sniper fire.... Hillary "sniper" Gaffe

That wench is a liar, just like her husband.

32 posted on 01/03/2012 4:25:19 PM PST by Sarajevo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; StarFan; NautiNurse
I don’t care what people here say. If she is VP in 2012, we will lose. This cannot happen. She is very popular in the general public. We hate her here but we are 10 percent of the population

I agree. Several women I've spoken to over the past three years - even many supposed Republicans - still long for a President Hillary. {{shudder}}

I've seen Hillary over the past couple of years swearing "I'm never running for office again!" I don't believe her. I think if Obama offered her the VP slot, she'd jump at it. :-(

33 posted on 01/03/2012 4:26:47 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

34 posted on 01/03/2012 4:58:40 PM PST by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I bet the Lockerbie bomber would endorse the ticket.

Mantoinette barely flys with Barky as it is. Out of 44 US Presidents there have been 20 assassination attempts, 4 kills and few near kills such as Reagan. A Detroit drug dealer has better odds. Hitlary a heartbeat away? Barky wants to live.

35 posted on 01/03/2012 6:19:08 PM PST by Reeses (TV gives men a window into what women want, and it isn't pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Hillary’s gunning to be the next dictator of North Korea. That gig lasts longer.


36 posted on 01/04/2012 10:11:30 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Since Obama's only challengers in 2012 are in the GOP debates, include him the next 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty
If our side screams LEWINSKI-"IS" in the same way we screamed HUSSIEN-WRIGHT-AYERS in 2008, we will lose.

A lot of people here think a major reason why our side lost is specifically that John McCain refused to go negative and never brought up Wright or Ayers on the campaign. I looking forward to Gingrich or Santorum doing just that.

37 posted on 01/04/2012 4:38:40 PM PST by presidio9 (www.catholicscomehome.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

A Kenyan jew hater paired with a socialist black/jew hater?


38 posted on 01/04/2012 4:47:52 PM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
A lot of people here think a major reason why our side lost is specifically that John McCain refused to go negative and never brought up Wright or Ayers on the campaign.

Yeah, I remember the HUSSIEN-WRIGHT-AYERS crowd when I first came here. On one hand, I was accused of being a DU/Daily KOS/Obama supporting troll for saying that the voters were concerned about the economy, not HUSSIEN-WRIGHT-AYERS. Yet on the same threads, they would say that Obama's supporters didn't know about Wright and Ayers because the MSM wasn't reporting it. And they couldn't see the contradiction in this. Funny thing is, many of THEM have since been banned.

I looking forward to Gingrich or Santorum doing just that.

Not me. Everyone who cares about those issues is already voting against Obama. They need to stick with the issues that the Independents and undecideds care about, which is how Obama has performed as President.

39 posted on 01/04/2012 4:52:13 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty
Not me. Everyone who cares about those issues is already voting against Obama. They need to stick with the issues that the Independents and undecideds care about, which is how Obama has performed as President.

Wrong. A majority of the people who will be voting have never heard of either Bill Ayers or Jeremiah Wright, because Obama got exactly one question from the MSM during the entire campaign. It came from George Stephanopolus, who himself had never heard of Rev. Wright until the day before, when Sean Hannity asked him why he and his colleagues were letting Senator Obama slide on that one.

The majority of voters only pay close attention to politics for six weeks or so every four years. They do no listen to political talk radio, and they do not watch cable news. This is particularly true of independents. Of course voters are concerned with the economy, but character also matters. The MSM built up a false character profile of Obama, and they will do so again if our candidate lets them. He can't run on his record, so he will make character a major issue, regardless of who is opponent is.

You don't sound like a troll to me, you sound naive.

40 posted on 01/04/2012 5:01:05 PM PST by presidio9 (www.catholicscomehome.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson