“But calling Coulter a slut is over the line, and downright trollish behaviour.”
I do not apologize for calling Coulter a “slut” because I meant it metaphorically in regards to her “loose political morals.” I will apologize for the appearance that I was trying dodge saying it. I consider “slut” and “whore” to be synonymous. I responded to the “sully” remark because I have, on several occassions, said that she “sullies” this forum.
Like I said before, I don’t know what Ms. Coulter is like in her private life and I don’t care.
She trashed Newt recently because she is enamored with Romney. That is what really pushed me to become firmly convinced she isn’t a real conservative, but has been merely assuming a personna to sell books. Plus, I know this is highly debated amoung conservatives, she IMO gave aid and comfort to the homosexual agenda. Thus, I don’t believe she should be given “air time” on this forum.
I do not have a hidden agenda. I am deeply worried about the moral decline of our culture (the repeal of DADT being an example) and also about us becoming vulnerable because of an ever weakening military (at 57 I’m still serving in the Reserve). Most times moral issues are my first concern. However, in this cycle, until Santorum won Iowa, no moral conservative was viable. So, National Security became my front issue. I have watched many of the debates, and Newt seems to be the most capable. I concluded that I would feel safest with Newt and CinC. I still feel that way even though I really like Santorum. Peronally, I think a Gingrich/Santorum ticket would be a winner...it is something I can get behind.
Ann is messing with that....by trashing Newt and blowing the horn for Romney. She needs to be corrected or silenced. Has she gone after Santorum yet? I couldn’t deal with reading her after the Newt thing. BTW - I am NOT a fan of Newt...I just think he is the best choice with the right mix of priorities. Anyway, I want to see the primary stop being such a mess. I want Romney & Paul stopped cold quickly so we can get Mr. Obama out of office.
Until Coulter can get her head on straight, she needs to feel the disdain of conservatives. If we allow her to continue, uncorrected, we harm our own best interests.
FR carries clout. Were she banned from FR, it just might be what it takes to get her either corrected or silenced. That is why I take such a strong stand against Coulter.
Most certainly I have not been as amiable towards you and others on this forum regarding Coulter. That is not something I am glad of. Also, please realize that I find the term “hot” as being vulgar. I read a wonderful editorial by a lady the other day that describes how we have started to show a preference to “hot” over “pretty.” “Pretty” implies attractiveness plus modesty and innocence. “Hot” implies just sexuality, and not in the right expression there of. We need to get back to seeing women(especially the young ones) as “pretty” and not “hot.” Sarah Palin is a “pretty” woman...it degrades her to the level of stripper/prostitute to call her “hot.” Sarah Palin is a virtuous “lady.” IF Ann Coulter is truly “hot, hot, hot” then she is a form of pornography. That is really crude.
You are wrong on almost all of that.
Your interpertation of "hot" just shows your preverted lack of communication skills in that area.
You act all rightous and indignant here on the forum, yet continue to send me vulgar FR mails.
She (Coulter) needs to be corrected or silenced
Have you read this thread and the past few of the postings of Coulter's columns?
She has been corrected many, many times.
Silencing people is what leftists do, Free Republic is NOT a leftist website.
FR carries clout. Were she banned from FR...
Being as you can not let that go, I would suggest that you tell Mr. Robinson in no certain terms that he MUST ban Coulter or you will no longer post here.
PS: Your rationalization for calling Ms Coulter names is quite weak. It was wrong to call names. Expecially those.
It degrades you, not her.