But in this case the donor donated the egg to her own partner, not another infertile couple. She never intended for the child not to be hers.
“But in this case the donor donated the egg to her own partner, not another infertile couple. She never intended for the child not to be hers.”
Yes, I’m surprised the courts didn’t at least split custody, since they were a “couple” at one point (ugh), but as another poster pointed out- there must be some reason she wasn’t at least made to pay child support!
But I’m glad that the court didn’t set a precedent by granting biomom custody just because she donated an egg that resulted in a baby.