Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ouch: Rick Santorum’s Young Nephew Endorses Ron Paul
Mediaite ^ | 01/05/2012 | Joe Bershad

Posted on 01/05/2012 9:47:31 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: lormand
Every family has weak genes somewhere.

My brother and two nephews are voting for Obama, again. Talk about stuck on stupid.

81 posted on 01/05/2012 11:47:38 AM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: noiseman
Completely, totally agree. Feel sorry for the 25,000 NASA folks that got the axe too. NASA was not the problem either, but that does not change the fact we are broke and we had better do something, like maybe elect a small constitutional government guy, about it. We have a very small window to address spending, if we do nothing we will collapse just like the USSR.

We do not have 4 more years.

82 posted on 01/05/2012 11:51:03 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: rashley

And pandering to Muslims...


83 posted on 01/05/2012 12:36:55 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
I think you're correct that we don't have four more years. We certainly won't have that long if we end up with four more years of Obama.

Unfortunately, I'm not confident that any of the Republican candidates understand what is truly necessary to restore us to even semi-sound financial footing. We should be immediately eliminating entire federal departments. The easy ones, Energy, Education, and most of the EPA should disappear tomorrow.

The second front in the war on bloated government should involve removing all of the incentives that cause it to grow in the first place. No more pensions for members of Congress, period. Elected office was never meant to be a lifetime gravy train.

Every bill should be required to include a clear citation of the specific constitutional provision that authorizes it.

And net receivers of unearned government benefits should not be able to vote until they get off the public dole. I know this one is pretty much politically impossible, but it gets at the heart of the problem. If we don't do something drastic to prevent corrupt politicians from literally buying votes with other people's money, the supply of "free stuff" will run dry anyway as the whole thing collapses.

84 posted on 01/05/2012 12:46:06 PM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: no dems

No joke. Its like a field of low hanging fruit with these clowns.


85 posted on 01/05/2012 1:02:31 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

not if sheer lunacy is at the heart of the act.


86 posted on 01/05/2012 1:11:38 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Ridiculous.


87 posted on 01/05/2012 1:13:44 PM PST by rashley (Rashley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Depending on how many siblings you have, it’s likely you have Paul or even Obama voters among them. If I were on the R ticket I have a lot of relatives who couldn’t get over that R enough to vOte for me.


88 posted on 01/05/2012 1:16:35 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

At Mr. Garver’s age we were voraciously reading Rand, WF Buckley, Jr., James Burnham, and Russell Kirk. We realized we were to the far-right of Barry Goldwater. LOL

Over time we mellowed and I’m sure this young man will as well, given time.

If the RNC/old guard doesn’t start courting these independent voices/voters ...they better think hard and long about the consequences.


89 posted on 01/05/2012 1:38:51 PM PST by Daffynition (*Pray for whatever passes for America these days* Amen. ~ ScottinVA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]



And for all you naysayers, complainers, and those
who can donate but won't for whatever petty reason,
DON'T DONATE!! PLEASE DON'T DONATE!!
click here to not donate with gusto!

90 posted on 01/05/2012 1:46:48 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rashley; no dems
Not wanting Israel dictate our foreign policy is not being anti-Semitic.

Indeed. How many of the FReepers who throw around charges of anti-Semitism would agree that criticizing the Mexican government is anti-Latino?

91 posted on 01/05/2012 1:52:58 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

Small, honest constitutional governance is lunacy? Wow.


92 posted on 01/05/2012 1:55:27 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

That is a regional characteristic of the north

Down here so few white liberals that most families are conservative with an outlier or two at most

My large clan of 100 or so in MS, TN, NC, TX may sport 2 libs...seriously


93 posted on 01/05/2012 2:06:59 PM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt...now Santorum?......Capt Trips could not say it better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Lol!!! c’mon - you’re smarter than that. Aren’t you?


94 posted on 01/05/2012 2:08:45 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

Good points....while I am a supporter of reasonable Israel in a sea of madness

I do not agree with the hyperbole “biggest ally”

That would actually be Britain

Israel is like one of our biggest dependents who does have ears on the ground for us in that region and makes our toys even better sometimes

Folks get carried away with holy land love

But Paul is naive....that is undeniable to me


95 posted on 01/05/2012 2:28:42 PM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt...now Santorum?......Capt Trips could not say it better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

I’ll be more specific.

Skipping over his blame-America-first that borders on trutherism, I’ll present his most recent meanderings into madness....

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/ron_pauls_foreign_policy_exposed.html

Hubby and I were watching this debate and we both, literally, gasped when we heard him say this...

“But to declare war on 1.2 billion Muslims, and say all Muslims are the same — this is dangerous talk. Yeah, there are some radicals. But they don’t come here to kill us because we’re free and prosperous. Do they go to Switzerland and Sweden? I mean, that’s absurd. If you think that is the reason, we have no chance of winning this. They come here, and explicitly explain it to us, CIA has explained it to us — it said they come here and they want to do us harm because we’re bombing them....”

un-freaking-believable.


96 posted on 01/05/2012 2:40:40 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
"they want to do us harm because we’re bombing them....”

He was probably just quoting the 911 report. The 911 report pretty much says the same thing. And Bin Laden pretty much said that too.

97 posted on 01/05/2012 3:06:22 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

We may have very good reasons for invading and bombing the people of the middle east. Of that I have no doubt, but when you invade and bomb it is not realistic to expect them not to try to harm you in return. If you want to go to war, fine, but don’t ask all surprised when the enemy fights back.


98 posted on 01/05/2012 3:15:27 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

don’t act all surprised


99 posted on 01/05/2012 3:16:42 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
"The 'cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war'

Ronald Reagan, a wise leader of men, declined engagement in the middle east even after the terrorist attack on the Marines in Lebanon. Sadly the Bushes have entrenched us in the endless wars of the middle east. The dogs of war are loose. Where will they run? What damage will they will do? No one knows.

100 posted on 01/05/2012 3:31:46 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson