why do I have the feeling you didn’t click on any of the links?
I didn’t, because I don’t need to, because I’ve already seen them.
Refuting Gore and then turning around supporting the government that is in the same direction that Gore wants is not a winner for me. Refuting Gore and then proving that man is NOT responsible for any type of climate change and that therefore the environmental restrictions on man’s business and personal activities needs to be lifted is a huge winner for me.
Just as Romney stating he will undo Obama’s state-run medical control is not a winner for me. Romney could have and should have used his Romneycare as an example of failed government-run healthcare in order to defeat Obama’s state-run medical control. Instead, we find the latter was blueprinted based on the former. Romney has blown it with me, too.
Look, we are, in fact, at the edge of the cliff. It is possible in a theoretical view to fix this economy. But the hardships that this would require, I believe, are far too severe for what the spoiled-rotten masses will endure. It would require a hardcore conservative with incredible leadership abilities to prevent the financial Armageddon that I believe is inevitable. So my thinking is, if we can’t get that candidate, we sure as hell should not give them a RINO. If we do, when the economy collapses in the next 4 years, as it seems most likely, the left will blame the collapse on “conservatism,” “capitalism,” “the free market,” and the “mean-spirited Republicans.”
I will vote only for a hardcore conservative who understands where we are. I’d rather the left win the offices and to allow the collapse to land fully in their laps so that there will be no doubt and they will never be trusted again.
I do not believe that Newt is the leader we so desperately need.