Bob Taft was a non-interventionist. Pat Buchanan even to this day makes a cogent argument for that. But Paul is too much influenced by the anti-colonialism of the ‘50s, and he seems blind to the implications of religious fanaticism. His posture toward the wave of Islamism sweeping from the Indus to the Atlantic is very like Obama’s.
Ron Paul is a non interventionist too. I can post the definition of an isolationist and a non interventionist if you like. Paul is not an isolationist.