I disagree.
Ron Paul is the epitome of libertarianism. (See tagline for my opinions on them people.)
And as there is a large quadrant of libs here at FR, I love to fling RoPaul in their faces as they clamor about for legal dope and open borders and crap like that.
Nothing exposes the hypocricy of libertarianism like RoPaul.
"A nation without borders is no nation at all. After decades of misguided policies America has now become a free-for-all. Our leaders betrayed the middle class which is forced to compete with welfare-receiving illegal immigrants who will work for almost anything, just because the standards in their home countries are even lower.
If these policies are not reversed, the future is grim. A poor, dependent and divided population is much easier to rule than a nation of self-confident individuals who can make a living on their own and who share the traditions and values that this country was founded upon.
There's a large quadrant here at FR that supports open borders? Name three.
Nothing exposes the hypocricy of libertarianism like RoPaul.
What is the "hypocricy of libertarianism" that Paul exposes?