To: Sonny M
“...it’ll clearly be a sign that the tea party has lost.”
No, it’s not.
The TEA Party chose to give Republicans a chance to caucus with them.
2010 was a great example of the TEA Party’s influence.
They have chosen to ignore us this go around.
To their peril...
24 posted on
01/11/2012 12:38:09 AM PST by
dixiechick2000
(Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
To: dixiechick2000
2010 was a great example of the TEA Party’s influence. They have chosen to ignore us this go around. To their peril... YES! Mega Dittos!
34 posted on
01/11/2012 1:09:47 AM PST by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts bolt The Constitution together as the loose screws of the Left fall out!)
To: dixiechick2000
To their peril...To their peril indeed!
48 posted on
01/11/2012 3:53:12 AM PST by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: dixiechick2000
The TEA Party chose to give Republicans a chance to caucus with them. 2010 was a great example of the TEA Party’s influence. They have chosen to ignore us this go around. That's not really the case. My early favorites, and Tea party favorites (Bachman, Perry, Cain) have faded mainly due to self inflicted wounds.
It's not really that some evil "they" have chosen to ignore us. It is as simple as our candidates not being ready for the challenge. I am disappointed, like you are, but we still have to beat Obama with whatever we have left.
94 posted on
01/11/2012 8:53:52 AM PST by
joe212
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson