Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swampfox101

There is a difference between private venture capital bailing out private industry and public money bailing out a union for political purposes. Romney’s company provided money for companies that were going under to save them. These were jobs that were going away sooner. They did this not out of charity, but to eventually turn a profit and the failing companies took the money to stay afloat. That is not evil, that is not wrong and they deserve all the profit they got for the risk. His attacks were not legit, and he admitted it earlier today in SC. Romney’s statement was to insulate himself from Obama’s campaign using Newt’s attack again him. Obama backed failing companies using our money and lost our cash which ended up in the pockets of the unions. This has happened time and time again only not just unions, he’d using our cash to give to his contributors so they can launder it in the form of democrat campaign cash.

We have a lot to dislike about Romney but being a venture capitalist is not one of them. He’s a flip-flopper on social issues and healthcare but people are starting the class envy talk around here and it’s sounding like a socialist teach-in.

Newt has been taken to task for everything he’s done. Again, you’re starting to sound like a democrat by saying recalling Newt’s record is an attack. he sat on the couch with Pelowsy. He advocated for a “cap and trade”, he backed the rino in NY 23 and bad mouthed the conservative. He tries real hard to be smarter than the next person and at times he’s been to cute by half. He’s a great idea person and he’s a seasoned political operative that would make a great president but his first thought is to solve problems with government.

Life is short and if you don’t like Rush, nobody is forcing you to listen.


97 posted on 01/11/2012 6:10:23 PM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: newnhdad

“:There is a difference between private venture capital bailing out private industry and public money bailing out a union for political purposes
Romney’s company provided money for companies that were going under to save them. These were jobs that were going away sooner. They did this not out of charity, but to eventually turn a profit and the failing companies took the money to stay afloat. That is not evil, that is not wrong and they deserve all the profit they got for the risk. His attacks were not legit, and he admitted it earlier today in SC. Romney’s statement was to insulate himself from Obama’s campaign using Newt’s attack again him. Obama backed failing companies using our money and lost our cash which ended up in the pockets of the unions. This has happened time and time again only not just unions, he’d using our cash to give to his contributors so they can launder it in the form of democrat campaign cash”.

Romney himself said that both what he and Obama did are the same thing. Romney’s words not mine.

“We have a lot to dislike about Romney but being a venture capitalist is not one of them. He’s a flip-flopper on social issues and healthcare but people are starting the class envy talk around here and it’s sounding like a socialist teach-in.”

Class envy? NO..!, not class envy but crony captialism. Many captialist have crawled in bed with the guvament. They take millions and millions of dollar and send their lobbyist to congress and they buy speicial favors or “graft’, if you will. Things that, at one time, would land you in prison. These “captialist”, as you all them, take their money and they buy votes, they buy favors, they buy special legislation, and in some cases they buy exemptions so they have to pay absolutely NO TAXES ON BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF PROFITS. I challenge you to please explain that to some working stuff making 60,000.00 dollars a year.

If I were and betting, I would bet you that Bain captial has and untold number of lobbyist with suitcases full of money on captial hill today. But NO, we can’t criticize Bain Captial, they’re “godly” and “almighty” captialist. Bain Captial and Mitt Romnehy wouldn’t know FREE ENTERPRISE even if it were to rise up and punch them in the nose. But NO, we can’t speak of Bain in such a manner, they’re “captialist”.

This is what the TEA PARTY is all about, government spending. Tea partiers are sick of “SO CALL CAPTIALIST” suckig off the gov. tit. Look at the bailouts. Who got ALL the money? CAPTIALIST. Captialist were the first ones in line for the handouts. And guess who was handed the bill? You guessed it. The peons. The taxpayers. Who was protected? The captialist. Defend that my friend.

Captialist suck that “ole guvament tit” and milk it for all its worth. But we’d better not criticize these folks because, afterall, they’re captialist. If you speak out against these people your’re an anti-captialist.

“Newt has been taken to task for everything he’s done. Again, you’re starting to sound like a democrat by saying recalling Newt’s record is an attack.”

I have said on these boards that Newt has baggage and he is gonna have to take the heat for that baggage. What I don’t like is Rush and others being selective in their attacks. NOT ONE politican has taken the AMOUNT of heat on Rush’s show as has NEWT. That’s a fact. Why? Could it be that Bain Captial owns many of Rush’s radio stations? Just asking...!

“he sat on the couch with Pelowsy. He advocated for a “cap and trade”, he backed the rino in NY 23 and bad mouthed the conservative”

Newt has done and said some really, really stupid things, he will have to answer for those. Even with that baggage, I know how Newt governed when he was speaker. He governed from the right. Romney, on the other hand, governs from the left. The man is even to the left of Obama on many issues. But we must not criticize Romney, he’s a captialist. “Bull Feathers”, the mans an extreme leftist a socialst and his voting record proves it.

.” He tries real hard to be smarter than the next person and at times he’s been to cute by half. He’s a great idea person and he’s a seasoned political operative that would make a great president but his first thought is to solve problems with government.”

In some cases that is true and that’s one of the criticisms I have of Newt. I would like to see him utilize gov. less, not more. But I still think, even with his baggage, he is the best man for the job. His record while in office says he will govern from the right and not the left.

“Life is short and if you don’t like Rush, nobody is forcing you to listen.”.

You are correct, “life is a vapor”. Rush does make mistakes and he has in this case. On this issue Newt is correct and Rush is wrong. Captialist don’t necessarilly believe in Free Enterprise. If they did, they wouldn’t be at the guvament tit sucking the American taxpayers dry. That is not class envy my friend, that’s a fact.


112 posted on 01/12/2012 7:40:58 AM PST by swampfox101 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson