Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich is a hero for arguing for “ethical capitalism”
Hotair ^ | 12-13-12 | KRISEN POWERS

Posted on 01/13/2012 6:14:08 PM PST by VinL

Furthermore, making a profit is only one component of owning a business. Whatever happened to the idea that you are responsible for your workers and to the larger community? Too often, people feel like just pawns in a ‘game’ of ever increasing largesse for the top dogs. The big shots are always the winners – often getting payouts in the millions when their companies fail — and the “losers” are left to figure out how to eat or buy clothes for their children. (A new study found that $100 million “golden parachutes” have become commonplace for failed CEOs).

Romney’s “class envy” claim is predicated on a lie we often here from the uber-rich and their defenders: the highest goal and achievement for Americans is to be wealthy, when all most people want is to be able to provide a decent lives for their families…

The unlikely hero in this tale has been Newt Gingrich, who has been making the most coherent argument for ethical capitalism. Says Gingrich, what we want is, “a free enterprise system that is honest. . . fair to everyone and gives everyone an equal opportunity to pursue happiness.” Criticizing Romney’s brand of free enterprise, (Newt)said, “It’s not fine if the person who is rich manipulates the system, gets away with all the cash and leaves behind the human beings.”

Be still my heart.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-391 next last
To: VinL

capitalism is ethical as long as you don’t have the involvement of the government in any way.


61 posted on 01/13/2012 7:06:41 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
...the essence of capitalism is the contract, honesty and trust...

You got that right.

62 posted on 01/13/2012 7:06:41 PM PST by Magnum44 (Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior firepower is the cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Nonsense.

All this talk about “ethics” and whatnot is just crypto-Commie language for “slapping the shackles of socialism on business owners.”

Business owners have a moral duty to capitalism to pay their workers as little as they can and to cut as many corners in the production of their goods as possible, so as to maximise profits.

Anything less is just a bunch of commie lib redistributionism.


63 posted on 01/13/2012 7:07:29 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: VinL
When 75% of the people say they don’t want the banks bailed out- yet the poliboro says screw you, we’ll bailout whomever we want

Bingo!

64 posted on 01/13/2012 7:08:19 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: livius

Amen! Well said!


65 posted on 01/13/2012 7:08:45 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I’d suggest Burnham’s “Suicide of the West” because that is what’s happening!


66 posted on 01/13/2012 7:08:53 PM PST by firefox ((Vote Democrat...Its Easier Than Thinking!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
Planet smanet..he gets a Universe!
Remember they get to be a god!
Though probably without the class of Zeus or Odin.
67 posted on 01/13/2012 7:09:31 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: firefox
In reality Romney took a low, but highly effective shot at Newt with his allegatiion about Newt making 1.6 million lobbying for Fannie Mae. Romney follwed up in interviews with the “If you can’t take the heat...” bromide. Newt decided NOT to lay down. Now Mitt is taking the heat and all of a sudden the conversation is how we Conservatives are disparaging Capitalism..

The only problem with your assessment is that the ads against Newt were true. The same cannot be said about the anti-Bain video.

68 posted on 01/13/2012 7:09:42 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Limbaugh is right.
******************
Not in my view. Limbaugh has always had a blind spot on this issue. We all admire Rush because he lived the Amerian Dream— going from nothing to icon— and none of us envy the money he makes. He earned it. He didn’t buy off DC politicians, or use insiders to destroy competitors- or use undue influence to maintain his preeminence.

But, Rush just doesn’t seem to be able to grasp that the DC crowd, the Estblishment, have lived the Dream- and now are pulling up the draw bridge behindd them. McCain, Bush, Romney, et al- and the GOP elite- they’ve made there fortunes- they have power— and all they want to do is keep it. If the rest of us have to live in socialism— they don’t give a damn.


69 posted on 01/13/2012 7:11:09 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
In this case Gingrich and Perry are Heretics, guilty of accusing Capitalism of being capable of possessing a sin nature. This, of course, is an outrage and an absurdity. To quote the great Rushbo himself, “Fairness? What is fairness?”.

You sound like one of those crazy bible thumping religious fanatics who think that business owners should be hobbled by junk like paying their workers a "fair wage." A "fair wage" is however little the business owner can pay you and still get your lazy non-business owning rear end to show up. If you were worth anything, you own the business instead of working for it.

70 posted on 01/13/2012 7:11:43 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: willk; VinL
...he bought"

As in Newt bought? Really? LOL!!!

71 posted on 01/13/2012 7:13:09 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

Michelle Malkin was a cheap shill for Willard the Lib in ‘08, too. She’s 110% RINO.


72 posted on 01/13/2012 7:13:15 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: VinL
All

Read Adam Smith's “Theory of Moral Sentiments”!
A work that he thought was more important then “Wealth Of Nations”. I would say a knowledge of Smith is incomplete if one only reads “Wealth of Nations”. They must be read together as a set to understand the points Smith makes in both books.

Read these then judge Newt & Romney!

73 posted on 01/13/2012 7:15:40 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

What about the ethics of sitting on Pelosi’s couch?
*************
And because Newt did that, I’m supposed to vote for the quintessential Republican,country club elitist- who is pro-abortion, anti-gun, a proven liberal, and a card carrying member of the New New Order?


74 posted on 01/13/2012 7:16:37 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Oh really!...was Newt paid $1.6 million or $35,000.00 per month as he claims. Did he lobby or was he an advisor?

Once you open the can of worms, as Romney foolishly did, you will find that folks will not be interested in wading through the finer points and details of whether the anti-Bain video is true or not.

Point is...perception is reality for many, unfortunately.


75 posted on 01/13/2012 7:18:39 PM PST by firefox ((Vote Democrat...Its Easier Than Thinking!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
"Yugo’s will make a come back."

Yesterday you were talking Volts, today Yugo's. You're quite the gearhead there aren't ya.....

76 posted on 01/13/2012 7:19:01 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Well, it may be Bible-thumping, but even thousands of years ago, in both Judaism and then in Christianity, employers were being urged to pay their employees an honest wage. What’s wrong with that?

But this has nothing to do with “fairness,” which now means that the government or some superior force has got to come in and equalize results. Most people don’t want to be the head of the company; it’s a lot of work, and most people just want to do their jobs and go home to their families. But the person who is the head of the company could not be the head of the company without them, and in fact there wouldn’t even be a company without them. Therefore he has the obligation to compensate them accordingly, which has nothing to do with fairness but is a simple matter of paying for a service.

When employers want to get the service without paying for it, or by taking so much for themselves that there is nothing left to pay the people who do the work, we have broken the social contract. That was what led to the rise of unions.


77 posted on 01/13/2012 7:19:57 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason
Says Gingrich, what we want is, “a free enterprise system that is honest. . . fair to everyone and gives everyone an equal opportunity to pursue happiness.” ... If nothing else, the Dems have a nice audio clip/quote to place in one of their ads - "see, even Gingrich agrees with us!"

***************

Newt quotes our Founding Fathers, and this fact is going to give the Dems ammunition. Then, that only underscores the extent of our problems in current day America.

78 posted on 01/13/2012 7:21:23 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: livius

Oh so you’re some kind of union socialist, eh?

Workers should be thankful to the business owners for the scraps they get away with stealing from the profits.

Mitt is absolutely right - if workers get in the way of shareholder profits, then send ‘em packing.


79 posted on 01/13/2012 7:22:19 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Gawd, I couldn’t read past the first few sentences of this navel-gazing drivel.

Kirsten Powers and Newt ought to team up to write the “Occupy Wall Street: the Broadway Play.”


80 posted on 01/13/2012 7:24:06 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson