Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News Poll: Romney Leads by 25 (National: Romney 40%, Santorum 15%, Gingrich 14%, Paul 13%)
National Review ^ | January 16, 2012 | Robert Costa

Posted on 01/16/2012 9:07:36 AM PST by Qbert

The latest national poll of GOP primary voters:

Romney 40%

Santorum 15%

Gingrich 14%

Paul 13%

Perry 6%

Huntsman 5%


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abolishregulations; beatromney; gingrich; gingrichsantorum; romney; santorum; stopthedivide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last



Click the Pic

End Freepathons!
Sheesh!! Do It Now!


Donate today
SIR! MONTHLY, SIR!

Sponsors will donate $10
For each new monthly sign-up

41 posted on 01/16/2012 10:22:23 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Is it just me, or didn’t RCP used to use a lot more LV samples in their national averages…? I could’ve sworn they did.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html#polls


42 posted on 01/16/2012 10:24:23 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Oh puhleeze - the media has been no help to Santorum. His numbers are incredibly high considering he doesn't have the millions the other candidates have had. He's the logical choice.

Sorry - as much as I admire Newt's intellect, he admires it more. He's an undisclpined hot head with an ego that isn't appealing.

43 posted on 01/16/2012 10:24:37 AM PST by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: manc
BINGO!!
44 posted on 01/16/2012 10:26:46 AM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Do you want a pro-life socialist? http://www.redstate.com/erick/.


45 posted on 01/16/2012 10:28:37 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh
So now, it looks like we have an awful nominee that is infintely better than ZERO.

No, he is not infinetly better than Obama, he is only marginally better than Obama and just like he did in Massachusetts to the State GOP with his compromising on all conservative positions, he'll destroy the national GOP if elected.
46 posted on 01/16/2012 10:29:20 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

“Santorum never led Romney nationally or anywhere, while Gingrich has shown the ability to utterly destroy Romney in the polls.”

Uh maybe a month ago. But then he wasn’t able to get on the ballot in VA and his vote collapsed.

Things change in politics, time to back Santorum because Newt has lost it.

“It’s Santorum that should of dropped out along with Bachmann after Iowa.”

Last I checked Santorum won Iowa. By this logic, Newt should have dropped out and endorsed Santorum.

“But the media hyped Mr 1% in the week prior to Iowa to hand it to Romney.”

That didn’t work too well, did it? Santorum won in Iowa, proving that we don’t need Newt.

“frothy media induced surge will last just long enough to hand South Carolina to Romney too.”

Newt did that all to himself. If Newt had simply held onto his polling numbers from December, he’d be the nominee. But alas, he fell apart and conservatives went with somebody else.

“Gingrich has a chance of stopping Romney at this point.”

No - he doesn’t. Look, TXFreeper. Newt’s done. He can’t catch Romney at this point, and has been done for over a month.


47 posted on 01/16/2012 10:29:36 AM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

Remember - Paul supporters too.


48 posted on 01/16/2012 10:31:48 AM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Sarah Palin stringed us around for so long that other true and tested conservatives stayed out of the race. Deny all you want, this is now the reality.

No, that is just your opinion distorted by your PDS.
49 posted on 01/16/2012 10:32:51 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Given that he won Iowa - Newt is playing the spoiler role.

Newt has yet to top 12 percent in any primary, anywhere. Right now, it’s looking unlikely that he’ll beat Paul in SC, and finally climb out of fourth place.


50 posted on 01/16/2012 10:33:11 AM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

"Is it just me, or didn’t RCP used to use a lot more LV samples in their national averages…? I could’ve sworn they did."

Not sure. I know they use LV samples in the state primaries more. Maybe it's too far out at this time to use LV in a national poll.

51 posted on 01/16/2012 10:35:56 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
The conservatives could mount a serious challenge of Romney if they’d just friggin’ coalesce behind one single (Santorum/Gingrich/Perry) candidate already!

Conservatives did coalesce around Newt four weeks back. Newt had a huge lead over Mitt.

Then the propaganda and the media spooked some and now we have a split.

Isn't this great./

52 posted on 01/16/2012 10:36:51 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
Uh maybe a month ago. But then he wasn’t able to get on the ballot in VA and his vote collapsed. Things change in politics, time to back Santorum because Newt has lost it.

Ah Ben.

Santorum isn't on the VA ballot either.

53 posted on 01/16/2012 10:42:23 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Back then, nobody expected it. :)

He was still at 1 percent in the polls.

Newt was the frontrunner. Perception is important - since he failed to get on the ballot, he’s been shedding support.


54 posted on 01/16/2012 10:45:20 AM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Yep- Just look at the final results so far:

Iowa:
1. Romney 
2. Santorum 
3. Ron Paul 
4. Gingrich 

New Hampshire:
1. Romney
2. Paul
3. Hunstman (out now)
4. Santorum
5. Gingrich

Final, official NH primary tally:

http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2012/RepSummaryPres.htm


55 posted on 01/16/2012 10:46:54 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Propaganda is to blame!

If only Mitt didn’t fight dirty - Newt could be president. /sarc.

How many times have I heard this excuse? Politics is war, FreeReign. Politics is War.

If Newt couldn’t stand up to scrutiny, then it’s a good thing we found out now.


56 posted on 01/16/2012 10:47:06 AM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I see the final NH numbers - where are the final Iowa numbers? Have they finally been released?


57 posted on 01/16/2012 10:48:24 AM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh
So now, it looks like we have an awful nominee that is infintely better than ZERO. YUCK!!! So that means we have a choice between mananged decline with mittens versus a chaotic, unpredictable implosion with zero.

I'm not a Romney fan but I will vote for him if it comes down to him vs. our Dear Leader. While I don't know know what kind of President Romney would actually be (lots of conjecture, but still unknown), our biggest hope is three-fold: get rid of Obama, keep the House and gain a majority in the Senate. While I prefer a leader who knows who and what he is, with conservative control of the two houses we can point Romney in the right direction.

No, this isn't the ideal situation, but at this point my main concern is making our Dear Leader a one-term President.

58 posted on 01/16/2012 10:49:39 AM PST by Kharis13 (That noise you hear is our Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I see they have 14 days (from the 5th) to report. So the 19th is when we will finally see the Iowa numbers.


59 posted on 01/16/2012 10:50:23 AM PST by BenKenobi (Rick Santorum - "The Force is strong with this one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Should be interesting to see those final numbers. If it comes out before 1/21 then, and it turns out Santorum won Iowa, it might be a good, late boost for the SC primary.


60 posted on 01/16/2012 10:57:54 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson