Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VinL
I know of no Christian who would say that Calista would be an inappropriate First Lady based on morality

Too bad your experience is so narrow. Many, many christians are opposed to immoral behavior and don't consider their position unbiblical. Rather, they feel they are upholding God's standards of good behavior for leaders in the public eye. It is a christian leader's duty to speak out against immorality. It is not "casting stones" as you put it. It is doing the responsible thing. Your argument is very similar to that of the gay marriage lobby (don't say negative things or you are "unchristian"). Hogwash.

As for your efforts to divert the discussion to areas

What on earth are you talking about?

173 posted on 01/17/2012 5:03:13 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Siena Dreaming

...and hypocrite, what is your opinion of Karen Santorum’s affair with a married abortion doctor...

..and your take on Rick Santorum wanting to marry somebody like this.

...and Dobson’s future silence on these facts.


179 posted on 01/17/2012 5:07:42 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: Siena Dreaming

Rather, they feel they are upholding God’s standards of good behavior for leaders in the public eye. It is a christian leader’s duty to speak out against immorality
*************

And you and Mr Dobson know God’s standards???? Especially as they apply to a First Lady? Edify me please— what are the Siena Dreaming moral standards for a First Lady as spoken to you by God???

And what about an absolutely lovely First Lady, Laura Bush. I loved her. BUT, at the national press club dinner, she did tell “barn-yard”, foul, filthy jokes to make her audience laugh. Should Christians have looked for her impeachment? Please tell me.

You then write: “As for your efforts to divert the discussion- what on arth are you talking about?”

What I’m talking about is- this thread is dedicated to discussing the targeted issue of Dobson saying Calista isn’t qualified to be a First Lady. That’s the discusssion. You bring up gay marriage? What are you suggesting- that Calista is not only immoral, but gay?


188 posted on 01/17/2012 5:21:53 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson