Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Siena Dreaming

Uh...Freepers critique all the time.
You saying none of them are allowed to criticize because they all have sin?

*********
No. I’m saying, if what Dobson is saying is true, it has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not Calista would be a “proper” First Lady. Unless, we now decide that we shall now vet the sexual past of every First Lady prior to voting on her husband for President- and make certain that she was a virgin prior to marrying her husband.


46 posted on 01/17/2012 3:29:41 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: VinL
No. I’m saying, if what Dobson is saying is true, it has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not

Oh, I could have sworn you quoted a scripture verse about "having no sin" or something.

In any case, I don't think Dobson's point was virginity.

His point was being a mistress. Quite different things.

Do we want a former mistress in the White House? Valid question IMO. One which I would certainly expect a christian leader to be concerned about.

65 posted on 01/17/2012 3:40:56 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson