Posted on 01/18/2012 3:41:06 PM PST by Bigtigermike
Exclusive... Developing...just headlines
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
Sent to Drudge:
Would you disclose how much Romney’s gang is paying you for all the spin against Newt? The quote “Marianne Gingrich has said she could end her ex-husband’s career with a single interview” was said a long time ago BEFORE she gave OLDER interviews about Newt. You making it look like that quote is part of this interview is totally dishonest. Please stop claiming you’re a journalist and just add the “Mitt Romney Approves this Web Site” graphic under your logo.
Lol, nice gif.
Do you snoop through keyholes, too?
Latest poll has Newt now running even with Romney after debate performance. This is why the hit piece will air!
PublicPolicyPolling Anyone want to sponsor a bonus Friday night PPP poll to measure any fallout from the Marianne Gingrich interview? 18 Jan
ppppolls PublicPolicyPolling 1 thing not driving Newt surge- Palin's comments yest. More voters say they'd consider her endorsement a negative than positive 18 Jan
ppppolls PublicPolicyPolling Mitt's not really losing support in SC but Santorum's really collapsed and his people clearly are going to Newt 18 Jan
ppppolls PublicPolicyPolling About 60% of SC voters saying they watched the debate Monday night...really could be the reason for Newt's momentum 18 Jan »
ppppolls PublicPolicyPolling Gingrich and Romney basically running even on the first night of our South Carolina poll. No one else close 18 Jan
“...Drudge says the interview’s tentatively set to air Monday, after the vote in South Carolina, but reporters from Politico and the NYT are hearing it’ll air … tomorrow, presumably before the debate.”
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/drudge-gingrichs-ex-wife-is-ready-to-dish/
ABC debate ethics of airing before primary.
BS. If it is the coup de grace for Newt that would air just before voting starts for the SC primary. That way Newt has no time for damage control.
I think your post was deleted due to Wa-Po copyright rules;
Here’s the link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/fbi-considered-a-sting-aimed-at-newt-gingrich-in-1997/2011/12/15/gIQAT7B1wO_story.html
Thank you very much!
Do you snoop through keyholes, too?
No need, Gingrich never denied his adulterous affairs.
If we were electing a man to find ‘good women’ he would NOT be on my list. He’ll also never make husband of the year... but he’s got what it takes to deal with the problems on the country’s table - and that’s backbone and will. That he’s got.
from what I’ve read, Santorum probably actually won IA, but that’s moot, it’s old news and nobody will remember anything about IA except that Mitt “won”.
The whole thing is a damn game where the media plays us all and donors rise and fall with predictions of success or failure as proclaimed by the MSM. The best thing anyone can do is completely ignore all the pundits and so-called experts and vote for whom you want.
South Carolina hold strong for Newt Gingrich!
This old news shall pass. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, particularly one with severe, unresolved anger issues.
They were separated for several years but not according to her. She’s a very angry, bitter woman. She gave an interview to HuufPo etc. And claims to be a Tea Partier. Right.
Your moral high horse friends want a life of pristine personal morality in a president? How’s Obama working out for them? I suggest they review their Bibles for the flawed men God chose and used to political (and sometimes spiritual) leaders.
Iagree with you. What they are basically saying is that Jesus is a liar an there really is no such thing as redemption and the forgiveness of sin, It’s sickening.
Correct, and he sought forgiveness from Him, married Callista, converted to Catholicism, and he and Callista are happily married and devoted to one another.
End of conversation.
I wonder how much influence Romneys Bain Capital has on ABC? Might be interesting to look into.
Interesting isn’t it? This story did not break until Newt started to rebound in the polls...
I don’t hate much - but I darn sure hate the media, and REALLY hate politics in general.
It is quite clear that the powers that be are working VERY hard to ensure that the American people are fully in their control when it comes to the “selection” of our leaders, and for me, it is well past time for to push back, and say that we have had ENOUGH. We will choose who WE want.
Perry is closest to my thinking/wish list, but they are NOT gonna drive out Newt if I have anything to say about it.
Dear Lord, please, guide our course.
Tatt
It's clear what the "suits" are doing.
They are reporting the story without reporting the story.
Instead of running the story, they are teasing the story, leaving it ambiguously hanging over Newt's head like a sword about to fall.
Which is just what they want. They get to have it both ways.
-PJ
Newt is a serial adulterer and he deserves what ever he gets.
Any of you folks who support him know this crap is going to come and it will destroy his chances....Thanks for supporting a self described progressive republican who can’t keep his pants up when a chick is in the room.
The man has no business running for president asking conservatives to support him.
How can anyone with a good conscience vote for the guy with this many skeletons in his closet?
If this is the best we can do then we are certainly screwed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.