Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919; Red Steel; DiogenesLamp; LucyT; Danae; Spaulding; Brown Deer
Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
147 posted on 01/20/2012 5:15:39 AM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: edge919; LucyT; DiogenesLamp; Red Steel

Hatfield files Notice to Produce

http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/Swensson-PowellvObama,NoticetoProduce,GeorgiaBallotAccessChallenge.pdf


149 posted on 01/20/2012 5:47:22 AM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: bushpilot1

A) It’s very refreshing to see a motion written by an attorney other than Orly ... one who understands how to approach the court and how to cite relevant caselaw, although ...
B) I’m not completely sure I follow the reasoning in No. 6, where the plaintiffs ask to relieves the SOS of the statutory burden of proof. If I understand the process, the SOS still makes the final decision. Maybe this helps establish the foundation for suing the SOS if he or she doesn’t follow the eligibility determination of this hearing?


164 posted on 01/20/2012 7:17:59 AM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: bushpilot1
Attorney Hatfield's citation of Malone v. Minchew (1930) saying that just being in the office doesn't provide a conclusive presumption of eligibility is very interesting...

I hope the judge finds it to be persuasive!

176 posted on 01/20/2012 8:56:51 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson