Twisting logic does not mean you get closer to what actually is. It just becomes a game of semantics. I hope you come to see the reasoning behind JR’s, Sarah Palin’s, Mark Levin’s, Chuck Norris etc. endorsement. We’re not talking about ‘the perfect candidate’ and any hyperbole regarding that is misguided but to propose endless semantic loops is for fools. If you are so enamored by another candidate.. and maybe it’s Ron Paul, I don’t know, you must acknowledge the strikes against him like we do every other candidate.. so you can stick with reality. There cannot be two or three different sets of criteria and each thing needs to be seen with a sober sense of what is. Making moral equivalency between Gingrich and the rapist is irrational and misguided. Hence, “stuck on stupid”. I hope you have a sense of humor and can find your way clear. I mean you no harm.