To: TFMcGuire
“He was operating under the misconception that Dede was more electable.”
But couldn’t the same logic be used to say conservatives should pick Romney over Newt because he’s more electable?
25 posted on
01/21/2012 10:17:32 PM PST by
ari-freedom
(If SOPA passes, we will lose our Free Republic.)
To: ari-freedom
But couldn’t the same logic be used to say conservatives should pick Romney over Newt because he’s more electable? Who says so? Karl Rove? David Gergen? A poll of politically unengaged Americans?
27 posted on
01/21/2012 10:20:03 PM PST by
Chunga
(Ron Paul is a fruitcakey jackass.)
To: ari-freedom
Romney is less electable, not more electable.
Romney has a political history of almost 20 years, and it is of a loser, a weak campaigner and vote getter, even though he always has the most money.
30 posted on
01/21/2012 10:20:33 PM PST by
ansel12
(Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
To: ari-freedom
But couldn’t the same logic be used to say conservatives should pick Romney over Newt because he’s more electable?
You're full of it.
Romney has never been electable outside of the liberal hell-hole of Massachusetts.
To: ari-freedom
Romney is NOT more electable than Newt. Remember I said MISCONCEPTION.
52 posted on
01/21/2012 10:32:41 PM PST by
TFMcGuire
(Liberalism Is Hatred)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson