Posted on 01/23/2012 8:25:36 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan
You know I’m always good for a new word to add to your vocal-berry.
I believe the populace has been in a stupor, realizing we let too much pass by and for too long. The Pelosi cram down
stirred our blood and now comes Newt! We have now a pulse!
%:D)
And then we have this from the “Chickenshit RINOs are making me puke” files......
Boehner, Cantor press secretaries balk at calls for Holders resignation
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836683/posts
Some post show reading:
GM Dealers Say No To More Chevy Volts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836627/posts
a lesson that, regrettably, santorum misses
Rush, you’re being too harsh on the regime going after Apple; They have all the answers on the left.
I nominate this young lady as business, agriculture and HHS czar (saves three jobs, /s):
http://www.collegehumor.com/video/5292946/brilliant-woman-solves-all-of-californias-problems
that is just some of em.....add Joe Scarborough, Lori klausutis,Gary Condit, to a lesser extent John Kasich,and a few others......
... quite the story
“Removing Australian Open and recording Fear Factor.”
SHEESH!!!
I just checked TV guide again:
10-11 pm on NBC is “Rock Center with Brian Williams.” That IS definitely the debate, so tape that also.
I am going to do the same, i.e., tape Fear Factor and Rock Center
Also, I am going to tape MSNBC from 9-11pm, just in case.
We will probably get more accurate info between now and then.
This debate has been scheduled for weeks. What can be so difficult?
guidelines at google, search for, china university cheating
Tons of how-to's, here's one
CHINA: Rampant cheating hurts research ambitions
Thanks, Rush! Let's go for it!
There's just one minor detail
"For the United States, the No. 1 problem with Chinas economy is probably intellectual property theft. Technology companies, for example, continue to notice Chinese government agencies downloading software updates for programs they have never bought, at least not legally . . . Chinas leaders have reason to be nervous about all the barriers they have built. Chinas elite, in government and business, are deeply concerned that their companies remain unable to create truly innovative products."
But they got hundreds of thousands (millions?) of engineers -- come on, people, let's do what the Chi-Coms do! Rush says so.
uh.. thanks again, Rush. I think. Are you pimping for Red China now?
I say, shame on Rush. Romney as a politician is a proven statist whom Rush refuses to condemn for being that proven statist. Odd, since Rush readily and plainly condemned McCain in '07 and '08. Romney is a statist through and through and we know it, yet Rush couches Romney's problem instead in terms of "not being able to articulate conservatism."
Hello, Rush? That's NOT why I, and I think I can safely say many of us here, reject Romney. We reject him because he's repeatedly, consistently demonstrated that he's a friggin' statist!!! All statism, all the time! In government, anyway. In business, something else entirely.
Yes, absolutely, Gingrich has been a statist at times, and having him in the White House would be a big risk. On the other hand, if Romney got the White House, there would be ZERO risk. Romney would certainly advance statism and more and bigger government as he always has advanced statism and more and bigger government.
Yet Rush assiduously avoids stating such a plain thing. Thomas Sowell, superior man that he is, had this to say about the differences between Romney and Gingrich -- Sowell has the guts to call a spade a spade.
Rush doesn't.
Rush thinks people like me are asking him to come out for Gingrich. Wrong -- I expect him, if he's the "voice of conservatism" he claims he is, to come out AGAINST Romney. It's the least he can do if he is what he says he is.
Romney has done NOTHING ZERO ZICH NADA to advance conservatism in America, while Gingrich, no matter WHAT else he has done, has done significantly more than any other candidate running to advance conservatism in America.
Gingrich blew it in how he articulated his criticism of Romney at Bain. RUSH MADE THAT MISTAKE TEN TIMES WORSE, to Romney's advantage. Rush screwed the pooch big-time, far more than Gingrich did.
Rush ain't what he used to be, except for one thing: he is mentally incapable of admitting he was wrong, even if it means sacrificing the best chance we've got to reverse the tide of statism in America.
Godspeed Newt Gingrich.
I don’t blame them. Who’d want an exploding car in their showroom?
:) I’ve enjoyed our conversation. Provocative without rudeness and I agree, you and I more than likely share similar takes on the Constitution.
As someone who works as criminal appellant attorney, the Fourth Amendment is something I encounter a lot. I fear my articulation has suffered from my attempt to both work and FReep and for that I apologize. I do believe we should stick to original intent/strict constructionism, and am frustrated when we don’t however I am not a big fan of subverting the law and legal process to change the law. It really irritates me when people do it for a political stunt!!!!!
There are all kinds of naughty puns I could make at this point but I’m too much of a lady, etc.
Here’s an example of “established jurisprudence.” Laws may be established law, but evil should be fought in every form.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836646/posts
Oh My!!! It seems short of moving to Vermont and proposing to Noot, Rush will never please some people.
there is less room in a Fiat X1/9 and..............
Is Rush therefore advocating we copy the Foxconn/Apple model, of all living in the same dorms, working 12+ hours a day and getting our daily serving of rice and pork from the factory?
What then happens to American icons like
the individual owning his white picket fence home
and apple pie?
Chopsticks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.