Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi On A Gingrich Presidency: "That Will Never Happen" (San Fran Nan says she has dirt.)
RCP ^ | 1-24-2012 | RCP

Posted on 01/24/2012 5:04:46 PM PST by GR_Jr.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 next last
To: RoosterRedux

Newt was just asked this morning on the Today Show and Newt responded “I have a simple challenge (for Pelosi), spit it out, tell us what it is”


181 posted on 01/25/2012 5:32:32 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Wow! Gotta love Newt’s way of tackling problems head-on.


182 posted on 01/25/2012 5:35:06 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.

Glass houses biatch. Someone needs to drop her.


183 posted on 01/25/2012 6:02:52 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.

The only thing that could turn me away from Newt is if she has photos of the two of them in bed together. Then I would have SERIOUS doubts about his judgment and mental stability.


184 posted on 01/25/2012 6:08:36 AM PST by conservaterian (Sarah/DeMint '12-XXX= Now what? Cain?XX Guess not. I GIVE UP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.

If this is true, a Gingrich nomination would guarantee Obama’s reelection and everyone on the left who knows about it will want Gingrich to be the nominee.

If Pelosi is lying, we have nothing to worry about.


185 posted on 01/25/2012 6:09:09 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

And if Pelosi is telling the truth, what strategic reason would motivate her to bring it up now?


186 posted on 01/25/2012 6:10:11 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.
Haven't read all the comments on this thread yet, but here's what Gingrich said last month on stretches threat..

if she’s suggesting she’s going to use material that she developed while she was on the ethics committee, that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I would hope that members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it.”

187 posted on 01/25/2012 6:13:48 AM PST by Track9 (The revolution IS brewing..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs
Someone needs to drop her.

Put out five square yards of flypaper and put a bottle of cheap scotch in the center.

188 posted on 01/25/2012 6:21:44 AM PST by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

LOL!!! That’s a good one!


189 posted on 01/25/2012 6:24:25 AM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; All

Or she knows the electronic voting machines (supplied by a foreign entity) are going to tally a victory for Obama by manipulating the votes in each state.

Perhaps Obama will get 98% of the vote like Saddaam Hussein used to be accustomed to...


190 posted on 01/25/2012 6:28:53 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Or this.

Tardive dyskinesia is a difficult-to-treat form of dyskinesia (disorder resulting in involuntary, repetitive body movements) that can be tardive (having a slow or belated onset).[1] It frequently appears after long-term or high-dose use of antipsychotic drugs,[N 1] or in children and infants as a side effect from usage of drugs for gastrointestinal disorders prevention.[N 2][2]

Tardive dyskinesia most commonly occurs in patients with psychiatric conditions who are treated with antipsychotic medications for many years. One study reported that within the first four years of using antipsychotic medications, 18.5 percent of young adults develop symptoms. Furthermore, 31 percent of those over 55 years of age develop tardive dyskinesia symptoms in the same time frame.[13] Other estimates suggest that it occurs in 15-30% of patients receiving treatment with antipsychotic neuroleptic medications for 3 months or longer.[citation needed] “A study being conducted at the Yale University School of Medicine has estimated that 32% of patients develop persistent tics after 5 years on major tranquilizers, 57% by 15 years, and 68% by 25 years.”[14] Other estimates suggest that with each year of neuroleptic use, 5% of the patients will show signs of tardive dyskinesia, i.e., 5% after one year, 10% after two years, 15% after three years with no clear upper limit.[15] Eventually, according to these estimates, if on the drugs long enough, the majority of patients will develop the disorder.[16] The incidence of tardive dyskinesia varies with the type of neuroleptic (e.g., haloperidol (Haldol) more often than perphenazine (Trilafon)), daily dose and duration of treatment (the higher the daily dose and the longer the duration of treatment, the higher the risk).


191 posted on 01/25/2012 6:30:53 AM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.

Maybe Newt did some other things with Nancy on that famous couch.


192 posted on 01/25/2012 6:31:28 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

I would think that what she is doing is pure and simple threatenig “blackmail”.

She’d better be very, very careful.


193 posted on 01/25/2012 6:36:48 AM PST by swampfox101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

181 posted on Wednesday, January 25, 2012 7:32:32 AM by af_vet_rr: “Newt was just asked this morning on the Today Show and Newt responded “I have a simple challenge (for Pelosi), spit it out, tell us what it is””

Good.


194 posted on 01/25/2012 6:52:35 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

Is Pelosi ‘threatening’ the Speaker? Whatever it is will hurt her also....would be my guess.


195 posted on 01/25/2012 7:23:11 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater
After all, it was Pelosi that certified to Hawaii that Obama was eligible, after Hawaii knew better, and refused to do so.

I remember that.

Let's hope it happens.

196 posted on 01/25/2012 7:59:23 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (NOT VOTING gets 0bamao re-elected. Lets Newter the RINOS, then the Blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.

It could be the Republican Establishment she’s threatening and not
particularly Newt. She is bound to have any access to ‘files’ on anyone she wants through her boy, 0.

And of course any little bad thing with Republicans is 1,000 times worst then anything a democRAT does because unlike the democRATS, the Republicans get rid of vermin. Just a thought.


197 posted on 01/25/2012 8:45:57 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (NOT VOTING gets 0bamao re-elected. Lets Newter the RINOS, then the Blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe; All

Newt Challenges Pelosi: “Spit It Out!”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/greghengler/2012/01/25/newt_challenges_pelosi_spit_it_out


198 posted on 01/25/2012 9:35:34 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Just to be clear, Newt DID NOT pay a fine nor was it an admission of guilt. The 300K was what the expenses of the litigation were.

http://www.therightscoop.com/1999-cnn-report-on-newt-gingrichs-exoneration-by-the-irs-over-ethics-charges/

Yes, That CNN! Hard to believe


199 posted on 01/25/2012 12:11:56 PM PST by halfright ("Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". -TJefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.

I agree with your take. Pelosi’s outburst indicates to me that she wants to stop Newt and help Romney get nominated. She’s a nasty piece of work, but she’s smart enough to see through the mainstream media nonsense that Romney is more electable.


200 posted on 01/25/2012 12:27:02 PM PST by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." --Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson