Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Marco Rubio scolds Newt Gingrich’s presidential campaign for calling Mitt Romney anti-immigrant
The Miami Herald ^ | 1/25/2012 | MARC CAPUTO

Posted on 01/25/2012 7:27:05 AM PST by Happy Valley Dude

Sen. Marco Rubio scolded Newt Gingrich’s presidential campaign over a Spanish-language radio ad that accuses rival Mitt Romney of being “anti-immigrant.”

“This kind of language is more than just unfortunate. It’s inaccurate, inflammatory, and doesn’t belong in this campaign,” Rubio told The Miami Herald when asked about the ad.

“The truth is that neither of these two men is anti-immigrant,” Rubio said. “Both are pro-legal immigration and both have positive messages that play well in the Hispanic community.”

Rubio’s sharp rebuke comes a day after he subtly corrected Gingrich for comparing Romney to former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, branded by conservatives as a turncoat who left the party before Rubio beat him in 2010.

Both Romney and Gingrich are in Miami on Wednesday for speeches about Cuba and Latin America.

The criticisms from someone of Rubio’s stature in the Republican Party comes as polls show a near-even race, albeit with Gingrich surging.

Rubio plans to stay neutral in the race. He’s a potential running mate whom both candidates would love to have on the ballot. And he’s gaining iconic status among many national Republicans who see him as a face of the future in a nation that’s growing more Latino.

Miami, Rubio’s hometown, is a key battleground. The candidates are all wooing the Cuban-exile community here, which accounts for nearly three-quarters of the Republican vote in the largest county of the nation’s largest swing state.

Already, about 54,000 early ballots have been cast in Miami Dade, where nearly three-quarters of the Republicans are Hispanic.

Rubio’s statement was fueled by the explosive, partisan debate over immigration, a key issue this election season as both parties aggressively court the Hispanic vote.

Democrats and liberals have tried to paint the Republican candidates as anti-immigrant or even anti-Hispanic for opposing legislation such as the DREAM Act, which provides a path to citizenship for some illegal immigrants — mainly college students and soldiers.

Rubio, who frets that the DREAM Act gives too much “amnesty” to a broader class of immigrants, and other Republicans have accused Democrats of playing rank ethnic politics.

So when Gingrich’s radio spot described Romney as “the most anti-immigrant candidate,” Rubio and others felt he not only crossed the line — he was adopting liberal criticisms.

Earlier in the campaign, Gingrich was accused of sounding like a Democrat when he bashed Romney’s time leading Bain Capital, a private-equity firm that, at times, had profited from restructuring companies and laying people off.

Despite the condemnation from conservatives, though, Gingrich went on to surge in South Carolina, where he drubbed Romney on Saturday.

Two days before, Gingrich began running his Spanish-language ad, which begins in shocking fashion by playing an excerpt of Fidel Castro repeating his trademark line: “Patria o muerte, venceremos!” — Fatherland or death, we shall overcome.

Romney in 2007 had mistakenly associated the Castro line with a call for a free Cuba during a speech. Some in the crowd of the Cuban-exile community were aghast.

“Unlike Romney, who uses statements from Castro, Newt Gingrich has fought against the regime,” the ad says, noting that Gingrich helped pass the Cuba-trade crackdown law, Helms-Burton.

“He supported the formation of Radio and TV Marti; and is in favor of holding the Castro brothers accountable for the shooting down of the Brothers to the Rescue airplanes,” the ad says, referencing a 1996 incident where anti-Castro activists were killed by the Cuban military near the island’s airspace.

Ironically, the ad bears some of the handiwork of Rep. David Rivera, a Rubio friend and confidante who backs Gingrich.

Rivera this fall helped stitch together a boycott of a proposed Univision debate by the Republican presidential candidates over the way the Spanish-language network reported a story about Rubio’s brother-in-law.

Rubio bears no personal ill-will to Gingrich, who helped support him when Rubio was Florida House Speaker in 2007 and 2008. Rubio and former Gov. Jeb Bush are headlining a Friday Hispanic Leadership Network event where they’ve invited all the major GOP candidates. Gingrich on Monday night began airing a new, positive Spanish-language TV ad.

The candidates Republican candidates initially balked at attending a U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce forum tied to Univision, but Gingrich and Romney have decided to attend today. Gingrich was being interviewed by Univision when word of Rubio’s criticism broke. On Tuesday on the campaign trail, Gingrich addressed large, enthusiastic crowds in St. Petersburg and Sarasota, where he invoked Rubio’s name.

"As many of you know Jose Mallea is helping us with our campaign. He was Marco Rubio’s campaign manager. We discovered last night that Mitt Romney has picked up Charlie Crist’s campaign people," Gingrich said in St. Petersburg amid a smattering of boos at the mention of the former governor’s name. "That sort of tells you everything you needed to know about this contest."

Turns out, Mallea worked for Crist years ago as well. And Romney has some high-profile Rubio workers on his staff just as Gingrich does.

Later in the day, when asked about the use of his name and the linking of Romney and Crist, Rubio didn’t sound pleased about it.

"Mitt Romney is no Charlie Crist. Romney is a conservative,” Rubio said. “And he was one of the first national Republican leaders to endorse me. He came to Florida, campaigned hard for me, and made a real difference in my race.”

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/01/25/v-fullstory/2607255/sen-marco-rubio-scolds-newt-gingrichs.html#storylink=cpy


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; immigartion; romney; rubio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: nbenyo

wrong...Newt’s position is reasonable in that people who have been here for over 20 years can stay...not Romney’s , right? That is not amnesty for the huge majority of job stealing illegals.


61 posted on 01/25/2012 10:37:05 AM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Liz

Newt’s ad criticized Romney *for being anti-immigrant*—
___________________________________________________

Well he is...

anyone supporting the illegal aliens is anti-immigrant...

you cant have it both ways...

Either you support immigration and think it good and necessary...rule of law..

or you think its OK for illegal aliens to break our sovereign laws by just waltsing in here and staying and taking jobs away from Americans and getting freebies that Americans cant get..

and screaming and demanding so called “rights” that immigrants already have...

words are inportant

meanings are important

rhetoric is important...

an immigrant is someone who comes to the US legally with correct papers etc

an illegal alien is someone who sneaks in and is not here legally

to be PRO-immigrant or PRO-immigration you must support the people who immigrated here

AKA enteredd LEGALLY

there are no “immigrants” who came any other way but LEGALLY

someone from another country is an ALIEN

someone who enterd here LEGALLY either has a temporary visa

and is to leave the country again by the day it expires

commonly called a VISITOR and he cannot work during the time he is here..

or he has a temporary visa to cover the time until he or she receives receives an Alien Registration Card AKA a Green Card (usually within 90 days)

and again he may not work until he receives his “green card”

The Alien Registration Card has no expiration date..

With it the immigrant can work and come and go around the US and also leave and come back as long as he is not out of the US more than 1 year...

When the immigrant becomes an American citizen the green card is surrendered and the number from it goes at the right top corner on the naturalization document..

That person is an immigrant..

all persons entering the US “without documentation” are illegal aliens..

so you have immigrants

and you have illegal aliens

Romney has supported illegal aliens for years

Romney is anti-immigration...


62 posted on 01/25/2012 10:46:12 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

I agree with Rubio that being in favor of legal immigration but in favor of deporting illegal aliens does not make one “anti-immigrant”; don’t you?
_______________________________________

isnt that what I said ???

thats the PRO-immigration stance...


63 posted on 01/25/2012 10:49:44 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
I had a great deal of respect for Rubio. I was dissapointed that he didn't throw his hat in the ring for POTUS this year. I did not expect him to endorse Newt, at least not before the FL primary, and possibly not even afterwards. That would have been a pity, but I would have understood it.

What I did not expect-not even a little-was for Rubio to hop into the tank with Romney and toss out a bunch of anti-Newt talking points for the MSM to gleefully regurgitate. Does that make him a traitor? That depends on the chosen context. Did he betray the Republicans? Nah, they don't stand for anything strongly enough. They are the Episcopal Church of politics. You can stand for almost anything and still stand with them. But if you ask if Rubio (and all the other establishment MittBots) has betrayed the Tea Party, well then, the question gets harder to ignore. Romney sure as heck isn't going to want to fight under our banner or die on our hill. But Newt just might.

As for me, Rubio is now on long-term double-secret probation. And that is also too bad. But it is what it is.

64 posted on 01/25/2012 10:56:17 AM PST by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ngat

It shows what a hypocrite Gingrich is. He pretends to be tough on illegal immigration in front of English speaking conservative audiences. Then he runs pro-illegal ads on Spanish spreaking radio.

BTW he is now pulling the ads because he cannot defend them.


65 posted on 01/25/2012 11:24:11 AM PST by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

It would be crass for Rubio to turn around less than two years later and call Romney a RINO


I get that part.
I think he could have worded it different.
Romney is not a conservative. There is some question whether he is actually a republican.
I have heard Romney make excuses for his liberal policies.
How as governor he didn’t have a lot of choice but to give in.
I have never heard him strongly denounce many of them?


66 posted on 01/25/2012 12:51:03 PM PST by Leep (It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Leep

I have never heard him strongly denounce many of them?
His liberal stances that is.


67 posted on 01/25/2012 1:00:21 PM PST by Leep (It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
It would be crass for Rubio to turn around less than two years later and call Romney a RINO and endorse one of his opponents (which is why I never criticized Sarah Palin for endorsing McCain in 2010)

You can't compare an endorsement to the importance of a Presidential ticket not turning on itself, Rubio did not need to endorse Romney and if he were conservative, he would not have.

Rubio has firmly placed himself in the anti-conservative camp.

68 posted on 01/25/2012 1:23:51 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo

No, it does not. It simply shows that he tried to take the high road at the beginning of his campaign, his opponent showed him in December that this campaign would be a say-anything campaign, or Gingrich would be wasting his time. So you need to quit being such a goody two-shoes about it.


69 posted on 01/25/2012 1:33:34 PM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: All

Mark Levin just said the same thing about Rubio calling Romney a conservative. He said, “Someone explain to me what part of RomneyCare is conservative.”


70 posted on 01/25/2012 4:06:09 PM PST by Leep (It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson