Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BufordP

I stand corrected.

I appreciate your research.

Obviously it was not Schippers that was the source of my assertion.

It is in my memory that Gramm was mentioned as the one who set the rules and the rules set the course of the trial which some saw as a show trial.

Whether that was in fact the case or I am suffering from a faulty memory I cannot say for sure, it was such a long time ago.

I do appreciate that this forum has those such as you who are willing to do the homework necessary to hold posters like myself accountable.


166 posted on 01/27/2012 12:14:15 PM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: Biblebelter

From what I was reading as I surfed around was that Gramm was in an unenviable position of having to negotiate between the honest Repubs (I’m discriminating between the good Repubs and the Trent Lotts) versus the Dems trying to work out agreements. He wasn’t forcing the rules as much as playing moderator. And even though he was playing moderator he was still trying to get the best deal for the Managers. Meanwhile, Lott was mucking it up.


168 posted on 01/27/2012 12:32:32 PM PST by BufordP ("Drink me if you can't take a joke." --Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson