AS of today I’m boycotting Drudge. I know it won’t make a hill of beans difference, but I’m sick of the obvious bias.
I have not been going to Drudge since he has been bashing Newt. These bashers have no idea how much they are damaging their own credibility and reputations with the rabid attacks on Newt. It is one thing to compare platforms and honestly examine records. It is another to attack him personally. These rabid bashers will not ever recover from their lack of honesty and professionalism. The public sees and rejects it.
AS of today I’m boycotting Drudge.
Stated my-self yesterday. I usually hit Drudge eight to ten times a day, yesterday, one time. To-day will remove him from my favorites and bookmarks.
Question; I read the statements made by Newt about Reagan. Are they false? If so, they should be proven false and used to pound Drudge. But if they are true what does this say about Newt? Has he gone around the country claiming to be the embodiment of the Reagan message and ideals while having held and published these clearly derogatory opinions of President Reagan in his past? If true then Newt is either a liar for making his claim to Reagan’s mantle or a fool for thinking he could make such a claim and not have his past uncovered. Newt must respond to Drudge’s posts and show how they are false and or taken completely out of context.
As of now I block his site.
A reader (viewer & listener too when those applied) since the start, I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. No more.
If the Republican party tries to shove Mitt Romney down my throat I may outright vote Obama just to spite them--in my location it doesn't matter.
In recent memory have we ever seen such an all out assault by a party and its media puppets to control a nomination?
People joke about McCain but it wasn't quite like this. Even in 2008 "conservative" talkers were trying to stop McCain by flipping to Romney when it was down to the wire.