Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sloop

That’s my bigger issue with today’s information. NOOT says he didn’t in fact have any friends who he could offer to ABC. I’m fine with not having any friends knowing whether or not you have an open marriage, but don’t scream at ABC for lying and distorting, and then lie and distort while screaming at ABC. It’s not just that you forgot or were mistaken; it’s an outright lie, while self righteously screaming at the media.

As for the Reagan quotes - I don’t know how many times I’ve said it but I hate hearing people trying to take on the mantle of Reagan, as if they are Reagan incarnate. Noot has repeatedly tied himself to Reagan, so the truth comes out that perhaps he has again purposefully misstated his accurate record (which, he smugly touts that he is a “great historian” while everyone else either has “poor historians” working for them or can’t recall history like he can because he was a professor). I think I’ve mentioned a few times how I wanted to beat Noot with Reagan’s femur for his continual “I am Reagan’s torchbearer” act, when he isn’t.

Reagan is dead; Reagan wasn’t perfect. He was a damned fine President, but no one, now, or ever, will be the second Reagan and it’s asinine to pretend otherwise. It’s doubly asinine for a candidate to pretend otherwise and I’m all in favor of calling out people when they falsely tout inaccurate records. For example, the whole purpose of my tagline is to show the Paulbots who try to lure people into their cult with “Reagan loved Ron Paul; Reagan would endorse Ron Paul.” BS.

If that’s how Noot feels about Reagan’s policies, he should be proud of that and highlight why his ideas are better. His supporters should be glad he has ideas on how to improve on what was a monumental and great Presidency, instead of pouting because the truth was revealed.

Bah. I don’t get why people get so caught up in people, and forget their principles. Imagine the hootin’ and hollerin’ that would be going on if Romney had an open marriage, or Santorum had an open marriage. (I distinctly doubt Ron Paul could have an open marriage, because frankly, I’m still stunned one person agreed to marry and have relations with him. I could be wrong, though, because Noot has found at least three women; and I would have thought that number would have been much lower too. ;o )


91 posted on 01/26/2012 10:13:55 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan ("I want to totally disassociate myself from the Reagan Administration." - Ron Paul, 1988)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: IMissPresidentReagan

Anyone have a pic of Mitt and McCain in Florida together?


98 posted on 01/26/2012 10:18:26 AM PST by GoCards (I am a Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

I personally don’t give a crap about his open marriage. I do not believe Newt used those words. I think he told maryann he was seeing calista and wanted a divorce. I think maryann said NO. Newt said. Fine, do you want. So she tells everyone he wanted an open marriage. And, if he did want to go along with seeing calista and still staying married to Maryann, well, i think that at least 1 out 4 marriages are that way now. Couldn’t care less.


117 posted on 01/26/2012 10:28:45 AM PST by Fawn (NEWT! NEWT! NEWT! NEWT! NEWT! NEWT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson