Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Generally, having $3 million in a Swiss bank account and failing to disclose it is considered a sign that something nefarious would perhaps be going on. At the least, it would cause someone in the financial industry to be investigated by his or her employer and possibly the SEC. Most likely the person would get fired.

It is considered a serious ethical breach. At my last employer, a rumor was going around that ownership was looking for someone to fire for being late disclosing stock accounts, just to make an example of someone, because they knew the SEC likes to use things like that as an excuse to effectively shut a firm down. There is no way someone who allegedly worked all his life in the financial industry doesn’t know this and failed to disclose it inadvertently.


73 posted on 01/26/2012 5:07:10 PM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Thane_Banquo
Generally, having $3 million in a Swiss bank account and failing to disclose it is considered a sign that something nefarious would perhaps be going on. At the least, it would cause someone in the financial industry to be investigated by his or her employer and possibly the SEC. Most likely the person would get fired.

It's wrong if your financial services company doesn't disclose it, but is it legal if you don't disclose it yourself?

But I get your point that someone who's been in the financial services industry should know that.

75 posted on 01/26/2012 5:15:57 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson