Posted on 01/28/2012 6:36:01 AM PST by vmivol00
Cannibals in GOP Establishment Employ Tactics of the Left
We have witnessed something very disturbing this week. The Republican establishment which fought Ronald Reagan in the 1970s and which continues to fight the grassroots Tea Party movement today has adopted the tactics of the left in using the media and the politics of personal destruction to attack an opponent.
Continue reading »
Name anything Romney has ever done for the conservative cause.
Look he could have probably won the Den primary...that’s the prize he should have sought.
You can blather on until the end of time, but that won’t change Romney’s liberal socialist record, and it won’t make conservatives support him.
Peddle your end of the world scare tactics and rhetoric elsewhere. If Romney is the nominee and conservatives don’t support him it won’t be the end of world. In all likelihood conservatives will be better off. This week has convinced me the GOP needs another whipping from the Dems. Maybe then conservatives can start to take their party back.
Regardless of what others say, yours is a thoughtful and reasoned post.
I don’t want Romney either. But I’m not so foolish as to believe that he would be “just like Obama” in the White House.
Having Romney in the Oval Office would be the equivalent of having a mushy-middle-left democrat. Think LBJ without the legislative “oomph” behind him. So long as we retain a unified majority in at least one house of Congress, he won’t be able to do much damage.
But Obama is an out-and-out communist. Always was, always will be. And having succeeded in circumventing the Constitution in minor ways in his first term, he will “reach for more” in a second one.
Regardless of the damage Romney may do, it pales in comparison to the damage we _know_ Obama _will_ do.
That’s my opinion. I realize others’ may differ....
This is just a “what if..” we stop supporting the GOP nominee because they know we have no place else to go, and Obama has landslide victory as half of the republicans don’t vote. Obama knowing he has 4 years but without the house and maybe not the senate can get his destruction done by EO and agency regs only goes even further radical then he he has now which causes people, all people, to rise up against him, take to the streets, Internet and airwaves to demand he leave office? Kinda like letting a big company go bankrupt rather then bailing it out.
Again, name the conservative options that he rejected. do you even know the process? It doesn’t sound like it.
_____________________________
Where do you get that from? My multiple posts saying that I will not vote for him in anything but the general election? Or did you pull it out of your ass?
Thanks.
You raised the point. You tell me.
________________________________________
Any fool could see that after four more years of obama there will be nothing left....maybe that's what you really want...is that it?
Are you really selling the destruction of the republic but hiding behind "principles"?
We don't know who you are or what your real agenda may be but that's what it looks like to me.
It is duly noted that you ducked the question of which conservative choices Romney rejected in favor of liberal judges.
Our Republic is still breathing and still fighting...give obama four more years and that will not be the case.
There is nothing at stake in a Romney Obama race. Romney = Obama. In fact Romney would be worse than Obama in two ways a) he would absolutely destroy the Republican brand because he would preside over the great collapse b) he gets a free pass on implementing big government from people like you. Period.
No matter who is elected — if you brought back a zombie Reagan from the dead — we’re screwed.
“It is duly noted that you ducked the question of which conservative choices Romney rejected in favor of liberal judges.”
It is also duly noted (insert harrumph and strut here) that this is thus far the best defense you can muster on behalf of your client, err... candidate.
Let the record further reflect (insert phlegmy throat clearing here) that you ARE defending one Willard Mitt Romney’s record as governor of the state of Massachusetts.
________________________________
I was wondering when you would start to lie...now I know.
Nice talking to you.
He has so far chosen two lesbian activist marxists. Two more similar justices and it will not matter one bit who owns the House, the Senate or from 2016 onward, the WH.
We will see Chief Justice Sotomayor who will run the court and the country for forty years.
Romney did not govern from a conservative standpoint. How would I know what conservatives he passed over when he was Gov? Are you really trying to suggest that there are no conservatives at all in Mass? That is the weakest argument I’ve heard yet for Romney. Your question illustrates your boy’s weskness. I’m sure you can find some better talking points than that on his website.
Show me one thing in his record (not just BS and lies that he spews) that bares any resemblance to conservatism. As a matter of fact show me where his record is substantially different from Obama. The only one I can think of is that Zero defines the “rich” at $250k and Mittens defines it at $200k.
If conservatives continually give in to this lesser of two evils BS, we will never regain the party.
I dont support socialist gun grabbers regardless of if the GOP tells me to. If you want bend over and take it...go ahead. That’s not my style. (but I hear Romney’s ok with that too).
By the way, how’s the weak conciliatory go along to get along approach working for conservatives? Yeah..,real well.
“He has so far chosen two lesbian activist marxists.”
Are you talking about Romney or Obama? I lost the context on who “He” is?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.