Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stonehouse01
I did not say that Romney is the answer. I do not support him and will not vote for him in the nominating process.

My point is that if the GOP does nominate Romney or somebody similar then we will be left with the realistic option of him or four more years, four years which would guarantee an activist, marxist SCOTUS and lead to destruction of America as we know it.

To stay home in that circumstance is tantamount to enabling that destruction. Voting for the GOP choice, however distasteful, buys time.

What we do with that time would determine if we pull back from the precipice and reverse course or if we have just delayed the fall over the edge...a fall from which there could be no redemption.

But, to surrender the field would be just that.....surrender.

28 posted on 01/28/2012 7:30:51 AM PST by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911

There is a problem with the tea party and how it doesn’t fit with the goals of the Grand Old Bastards. But that problem is not perfectly matched to this election. Maybe the Entrenched Old Schmucks want Romney. But Romney is not an establishment republican. He’s more of a RINO than McCain ever was, and that’s saying something. And Newt is not your perfect Tea Party candidate. He has the fight in him but it’s not always in our direction. He’s worrisome enough for Palin to not double down on him.

This is a toughie. To go with the strongest debater? Or the strongest conservative? Tea parters will not vote the RINO. One has much higher negatives and that means people could be loathe to vote for him. Everyone wants the best for America, but not everyone knows which man will achieve it.


34 posted on 01/28/2012 7:45:32 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911

Take a look at the judges Romney appointed. An overwhelming majority of them are registered Democrats. They are overwhelmingly liberal. Why is it surprising or shocking that he would appoint judges that share his views?

It would be shocking if he were to actually appoint a conservative. Of course he and the rest of GOP will tell you that because they know it’s what you want to hear.

It’s Lucy and the football. Don’t be a Charlie Brown. Kick that (fill in the blank) in the head instead!


43 posted on 01/28/2012 7:58:10 AM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911
Voting for the GOP choice, however distasteful, buys time.<<

yeah...we bought time in the last election....Remember?...How long u wanna wait??

sometimes its better to man up to the situation and take your chances early... rather then live your life in constant retreat and be out-numbered by your own time consuming indecision's....Think it over..

That's my opinion...I welcome yours.........

82 posted on 01/28/2012 8:05:23 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson