The moslums are very afraid that Paul might win or that his idea of cutting all foreign aid might carry through. Once America cuts aid to Israel, it also cuts the leash that America has had on Israel’s military, one which it has used to rein in Israel again and again when they were on the brink of permanently destroying their enemies. With no more leash, Israel would be UNLEASHED and they could no longer afford to wait. Israel would crush Islam and free the Arab people from the 7th century prison they have been held in.
Go Ron Paul
Bingo! We have a winner.
“The moslums are very afraid that Paul might win or that his idea of cutting all foreign aid might carry through. Once America cuts aid to Israel, it also cuts the leash that America has had on Israel’s military, one which it has used to rein in Israel again and again when they were on the brink of permanently destroying their enemies. With no more leash, Israel would be UNLEASHED and they could no longer afford to wait. Israel would crush Islam and free the Arab people from the 7th century prison they have been held in.
Go Ron Paul”
____________________
You are either Drunk.... Or Insane....
There is no third choice.
The moslums are very afraid that Paul might win or that his idea of cutting all foreign aid might carry through. Once America cuts aid to Israel, it also cuts the leash that America has had on Israel’s military, one which it has used to rein in Israel again and again when they were on the brink of permanently destroying their enemies. With no more leash, Israel would be UNLEASHED and they could no longer afford to wait. Israel would crush Islam and free the Arab people from the 7th century prison they have been held in.
FR needs a "Like" button.
BTW - cutting all foreign aid also stops Israel's enemies from using our money to attack Israel.
You know, rush limbaugh had a great piece a few years back talking about how wars only end when one side is defeated and yet it is apparent no ‘victor’ has been allowed for the past 50 years in the Arab Israeli conflict, generally due to outside meddling influences, mostly egotistical politicians wanting to be seen as peacemakers and Arab tyrants seeking to keep Israeli boogeyman in the forefront rather than their own socialist dictatorships. Paul said the same recently in an interview with haartz or some such Israeli newspaper. I will try to find these links.
We could ask ourselves the reasons he is considered by some to be ‘anti-israel’ and perhaps we would find the same reason that many black leaders continually advocate policies for their ‘people’ that keep a sizable portion of them subjugated, dependent and in intellectual, moral, and financial poverty 150 years after the end of slavery. Sometimes those seen as most ‘against’ are actually most ‘for’ and vice versa, yet in a electorate dominated by political emotions and insecurities it takes history to prove who is right in the long haul.