[Mari2525]

The question was not irrelevant, and only required a simple yes or no. Even IMRR said my conclusion was logical to what she typed. (See post 149).

You don’t know me, but if you care to waste your time psychoanalyzing me for a simple question, that required a simple answer go right ahead.

And just so you know, I’ve already heard several reasons why Newt, Santorum, Bachmann and Perry didn’t get on the ballot, but I’m not dwelling on it. It’s over. It’s not going to change.

[sloop]

i hit the nail on the head - you want to complain about personal attacks but were fishing to attack others

since you are not dwelling on it - and not going to change it - and not interested in the reason, i’d say i pegged you

[Finny]

To put sloop and IMissPresidentReagan into perspective, neither can provide a simple written answer, though I've asked before, as to why they spell it "noot" instead of "Newt."

So it's no surprise to me, nor probably to lots of readers, that you can't get a simple yes or no answer out of them. :^)

[IMissPresidentReagan]

Wow. I keep forgetting that those who have no reading comprehension are also incapable of picking up on sarcasm.