Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright
"Its what he put out in his 2006 election to prove to moderates and liberals in PA that he’s one of them. Pretty darned convincing too."

In that case, I'm sure you and Schumer are happy with the results of that 2006 election. Schumer deliberately targeted Santorum and while I can't find the verbatim quote at my fingertips, he said something to the effect that even if the dems had taken back the senate, he would have still regarded it as something of a loss had they not elimated Santorum.

IMHO, I would judge a conservative's credentials more by their loudest enemies than by an ill-considered campaign brochure. You're free to do otherwise.

105 posted on 02/01/2012 5:57:57 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack

This is where it gets difficult, so I will write slowly so you can understand ,because clearly to this point I have whooshed this right over your little head.

Rick S is running as “the one true conservative” and bragging that he always “takes the slings and arrows” and that in his 06 election - he says over and over and over and over and over and over and over again - that he at least lost standing up for principles.

That is all bullish-t. He lost trying like heck to be loved by the liberals and the moderates.

Every grown up supporting Newt is doing so eyes wide open with the pro’s and the con’s. Many children supporting Rick think he is something that he most certainly is not.


110 posted on 02/01/2012 6:07:54 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson