Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58
Congress can not undo the constitution. It requires a constitutional amendment to do so. Anchor babies are not mentioned in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
197 posted on 02/01/2012 10:10:19 PM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman
You have absolutely no concept of the law, at all.

The 14th Amendment caused the “Anchor Baby” problem. However, since that Amendment contains the “-— subject to the jurisdiction thereof -—” clause, Congress can easily, through simple legislation, fix the Anchor Baby issue.

Also, since even the “Case Law” you Birthers post says, clearly, from the COURTS YOU CITE, that the Constitution does not define the term, and since said Case Law CLEARLY refers to Common Law -—

Legislation trumps Common Law!

NO COURT HAS EVER RULED THAT THERE IS A CONSTITUONAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AND CITIZEN AT BIRTH!

The Constitution expressly allows for Congress to determine the Jurisdiction of the Courts, and the Constitution also allows for Congress to define, interpret, enforce and enact the Constitution.

You are CREATING a “Constitutional” issue where no such issue exists.

214 posted on 02/01/2012 10:28:30 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson