[TheGunny]

Ill tell you what clears it up for me soldier, is that it is abundantly clear that you don't know what in the hell you are talking about! A) there are no FOB’s in Kuwait, B) Almost EVERY so called FOB in AFG is subject to indirect fire, and C) the determination of what area is or isnt a “combat zone” is way the hell above your pay grade. I never said that the “pro-rated” approach wasnt a good one, I think it is. Let me offer you a bit of education...a rifle slinging grunt isnt the only hazardous endevor in a combat zone! There are plenty of support roles and many in aviation that make the mission even possible...that is before grunt shit like yourself attempts to kick in a door! Those guys (again) are sitting in those FARP’s and FOB’s living and dying for each other and for their country. Dont break your arm patting yourself on the back for doing your f’ing job!

[And2TheRepublic]

Got to love your obvious and deliberate condescending tone.

I never said there were FOBs in Kuwait. I was merely using Kuwait as an example of what I believe is an abuse of Imminent Danger pay. I also use the term FOB loosely to represent all camps and bases as many in the Armed Forces do this. I know the difference between them.

In one one of my first posts (the one that inspired you to respond to me), I clearly stated that the bad part of this policy could potentially be that many people other than grunts like myself, are in harms way are deserving of such extra pay. But i can only assume you skipped over that part.

You assume a lot, overlook much, and act is if another human being can’t have an opinion other than your own.

If such beliefs are above my pay grade, wouldn’t your single minded approach to attack mine be above your pay grade as well?

Like my tagline states: People like freedom of speech, but only when it’s sweet to their ears.

Maybe you should get off that high horse of yours.