OK, I read the whole WND article and Hatfield says that he DIDN’T submit any birth certificate for Obama. There’s nothing like that in the record for his case.
Hatfield takes issue with Malihi combining these 3 cases again, even though it was granted at the request of the plaintiffs that they would be 3 separate cases. Malihi “considers” that Obama was born in HI to a US citizen mother, but neither Hatfield nor Taitz presented any evidence that would justify finding that as a fact.
Malihi is just pulling this stuff out of his rear end. “Judge’s knowledge”. One of the big differences between the sharia obeyed in Iran and the legal evidentiary requirements of the free world including the USA.
It would have been interesting if another plaintiff just challenged simply on the age requirement and nothing else.
The remedy to that would be easy - a certified, verified, on real security paper with a real seal BC - either flavor.
But they will not let those frauds into court. Or no real attorney would be caught presenting them in a court.
I wonder if Malihi ‘considers’ Obama over the age of 35 - since no evidence of even that requirement was presented.