You know, I wonder if Orly Ditz hadn’t introduced the birth certificate into evidence (saying it was a forgery), if the judge would have HAD to rule against Obama. If she hadn’t done that, he would not have even had any evidence, even bogus evidence, that said Obama was born in the US. Because Taitz introduced the forged birth certificate, that gave him the option to claim Obowmao was born in Hawaii, and thus rule as he did.
A bizarre thought came to me about this “natural born” issue. What about sperm donations...who knows where that originates? Naturally, the mother (sometimes a single parent) using the sperm donation would probably be natural born, but who and what is the nationality of the Daddy? Don’t suppose it would matter in a surrogacy situation, as the woman carrying the child is basically just hatching it. The “natural born” issue I am afraid is going to go by the wayside, being assailed as it is on all sides. Both Romney and Santorum have questions in this regard, as does Jindahl & Rubio if they have future Presidential aspirations, that I can think of offhand...not to mention the offender in chief, Obozo in the White House.
There were 3 separate cases...
Actually it was Hatfield and Irion who submitted the forged BC as evidence and did not contest its genuineness. Orly contested the genuineness but did so incompetently, without certifying her “expert witnesses”.
But no judge could accept an internet image as if it was a genuine vital record; it simply doesn’t meet the legal standards for admissible evidence.