Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Well that tactic didn’t work out for Newt in Iowa, where he lost a 20 point lead under a multimillion dollar assault of unanswered negative attacks in a 2 week period, did it?


45 posted on 02/08/2012 3:20:58 PM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: wolfman23601

No, point taken. But Rick is not Newt. Newt is “all baggage, all the time” and has tremendous negatives, simply vast. I also think his peak lead over Romney was not at all sustainable and may well have been a planted story.

Perhaps I’m wrong, but I don’t think Rick has that kind of vulnerability, and I also believe the electorate is getting damned tired of the relentless negativity. Pick whomever you want, I seriously doubt GOP’ers of any stripe want their primaries run that way. Regardless, I most strongly believe that if Rick allows himself to be defined by whatever poop Mitt throws at him, that’s a guaranteed loss.


53 posted on 02/08/2012 4:22:08 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (The only economic certainty: When it all blows up, Krugman will say we didn't spend enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson