Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/11/2012 4:56:49 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: narses; Salvation

Ping


2 posted on 02/11/2012 5:02:17 AM PST by verga (Protestant puppies have their eyes closed, Catholic ones have their eyes open.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Let's get down to basics here. Obama has more than his fair share of sexual deviants on his staff. They wrote the rules here, probably slavering and snorting all the while.

We really do have to imagine them with their gay face on.

They aren't concerned for your religious liberties at all ~ didn't give it a second thought. What they want is for you to focus on their sexual needs ~ or somebody's sexual needs ~ or whatever ~ to the exclusion of everything else.

3 posted on 02/11/2012 5:14:49 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

4 posted on 02/11/2012 5:37:10 AM PST by I see my hands (The old sod ne'er shall be forgot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"The Obama administration recently ruled that all insurance policies must offer contraceptive services with no co-payments required."

Oh! Goody! More Free Stuff. Now you like sex as a means of Entertainment and Enjoyment (Do men get FREE CONDOMS as well?) but I want to go to the theater 4 times a week - can I get FREE THEATER TICKETS? Equal Protection and all that.

5 posted on 02/11/2012 5:53:08 AM PST by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"The Obama administration recently ruled that all insurance policies must offer contraceptive services with no co-payments required."

I agree with Rush that this was the end-game. The dust up with the Catholic Church was just a red herring which they know will be forgotten by election time.

8 posted on 02/11/2012 6:23:08 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks Right-Wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He offended me WAY before his fumbling.


10 posted on 02/11/2012 6:43:37 AM PST by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

My Gawd Man, you talk about this (the article) like it were an issue where if the president would have only handled this better, everything would go on swimmingly... the hell it would! Obama is a menace to America and her constitution. He seeks to turn our freedom into fiefdom, from where all are free moral agents to, if you live according to his mandates, you will be cared for... the arrogance and deluded self importance of our moral busybody president must come to an end... this year!!!


12 posted on 02/11/2012 7:06:03 AM PST by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Correct me if I am wrong. It’s still a mandate, just switched who pays for it.


13 posted on 02/11/2012 7:18:01 AM PST by duckman (Go Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Liability insurance is generally purchased in order to prevent the possibility of being hit with a huge bill down the line. Health insurance the same. Why would anyone need insurance to avoid the possibility of being hit with a huge bill for contraceptives or “morning after” abortion pills? The bill, if one paid it him or herself, is minuscule. The real nub of all of this is, as always, abortion by medical intervention. Nothing else costs enough to warrant the purchase of insurance.


17 posted on 02/11/2012 9:27:52 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; All
Rasmussen is way off base here, continuing the fallacy being repeated over and over again in the media (yes, Fox too) that this is about "women's health care," etc.

There was no "fumble." Rush labeled it correctly as a "power grab" and an assault on the First Amendment which, if these talking heads keep defining it to the public in the President's chosen semantic method, risks all the individual liberties included in that First Amendment's listing.

The President knows that if he can persuade the Catholic Church and other religious leaders to view his seeming "fumble" as a "recovery" which is acceptable, then the First Amendment's protections for free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, right to peaceably assemble, and appeal to Government for redress of grievances--all have been forever breached and are vulnerable targets for tyrannical leaders.

Church leaders must take on the task of educating their members on the ideas of liberty--a task their ancestors did not shy from during the revolutionary period. The sermons of those days rang out with appeals for ordered liberty and respect for the "rights of conscience."

Axelrod and the other "handlers" believe they can manipulate the political argument to their advantage. Perhaps they underestimate the voices of freedom in the religious community.

"Although all men are born free, slavery has been the general lot of the human race. Ignorant—they have been cheated; asleep—they have been surprised; divided—the yoke has been forced upon them. But what is the lesson? ... the people ought to be enlightened, to be awakened, to be united, that after establishing a government, they should watch over it ... It is universally admitted that a well-instructed people alone can be permanently free."

18 posted on 02/11/2012 10:23:55 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

In November, he is gone!


21 posted on 02/11/2012 11:52:43 AM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson