Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LuvFreeRepublic

“Santorum has not been vetted and he needs to be.”

I am going to snark a bit...

IMHO, I have three things to say about this. Vet 0bama, then.

If he’s not going to be vetted, don’t vet Santorum anymore than he has been.

But, if someone’s going to vet Santorum without vetting 0bama, then every living soul who can needs to shout out, put forth and scream IN PUBLIC forums questions about 0bama’s lack of recorts of any kind....with a specific demand, like the COLB, transcript, CT SSN, New Party affiliation, Rezko/Khalidi/Iraqi guy now in the UK (starts with an ‘A’ IIRC), entrance to Columbis, etc. Pick one and push it.


144 posted on 02/11/2012 8:07:40 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: combat_boots
[don’t vet Santorum anymore than he has been.]

Right, Newt has been utterly trashed from your side, while Santorum is declared off limits. What's fair from your perspective suddenly becomes unfair when the momentum turns around.

IOW, Leave poor little Ricky alone! (But trash Newt at every opportunity!)

155 posted on 02/11/2012 8:23:33 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson