Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Obama Order Grocers to Give Away Bread
Townhall.com ^ | February 15, 2012 | Terry Jeffrey

Posted on 02/15/2012 9:21:20 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Kaslin
Can Obama Order Grocers to Give Away Blood

OK, the Twilight series of books has now gone too far.

21 posted on 02/15/2012 10:03:35 AM PST by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Is it bloody?


22 posted on 02/15/2012 10:06:03 AM PST by Osage Orange (A clear conscience is the sign of a fuzzy memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think the “compromise” is even worse than the original mandate (if such a thing is possible).

First, as the article points out, it forces insurers to give coverage for “free”, and this sets a horrible precedent.

But, in the real world, the insurers will simply raise the rates they charge religious institutions that object to covering contraceptives on moral grounds, anyway. Of course, the contraceptive coverage will be officially “free”, but the premiums to cover everything else will go up by whatever the contraceptive coverage would cost.

Roman Catholic and other religious organizations, and their employees who contribute to health insurance costs, will STILL be paying for contraceptive coverage.

The idea that insurance companies are simply going to absorb millions of dollars of costs, rather than passing them on by sneaking them into the premiums, is absurd.


23 posted on 02/15/2012 10:12:20 AM PST by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

Turnip blood!


24 posted on 02/15/2012 10:17:52 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I just checked in Creators.com. It says Bread, so it must have been the stupid editor in Townhall.com who changed it

The title at Townhall correctly says BREAD also:

"Can Obama Order Grocers to Give Away Bread"


25 posted on 02/15/2012 10:19:50 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcutisapayraise

This really is it, isn’t it? The question is who owns your body and the fruits of it’s labors? How very strange that the prochoice people started out with “My body is nobody’s body but mine”.


26 posted on 02/15/2012 10:25:11 AM PST by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I’m more than willing to send Obama a stool sample.

LOL!

27 posted on 02/15/2012 10:30:37 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Anima Mundi

Mundi wrote: “This really is it, isn’t it? The question is who owns your body and the fruits of it’s labors? How very strange that the prochoice people started out with ‘My body is nobody’s body but mine.’”

Sadly, I agree with your observation. Additionally, and setting aside the moral debate, one of the biggest legal problem with same sex marriage; where is the legal hurdle that prevents poly marriages and incestual marriages?

They know not what they ask for themselves — emotional, spiritual and economic bondage.


28 posted on 02/15/2012 11:05:18 AM PST by taxcutisapayraise (Making Statism Unpopular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking on this. But...the truth is that any Catholic of moral conscience that accepts health insurance coverage that requires birth control is committing a grave sin.

I know this won’t happen, but every Catholic that is of faith needs to demand a change in coverage or drop the insurance.

Such a decision is a matter of faith, but if people of faith want to whine about this mandate...then they need to walk the walk and trust God to do the rest.


29 posted on 02/15/2012 11:05:28 AM PST by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Obama can force us to pay money for health insurance, ordering the able bodied to donate blood, which literally saves lives, is not out of scope.


30 posted on 02/15/2012 11:57:36 AM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
Yeah but the original title in creators.com said bread, not blood

Can Obama Order Grocers to Give Away Bread?

By Terrence Jeffrey

An no, no one can force anyone to give blood

31 posted on 02/15/2012 12:05:58 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The federal government will still order all health insurance plans to cover sterilizations, contraceptives and abortifacients without any fees or co-pay.

So I'll be able to walk into the local Walgreen's and pick up a pack of Trojans for free? Or will it only cover contraceptives for women? Isn't sterilization an elective surgery? Why is there such a focus only on women's health issues? What's next? Free sex change operations?

32 posted on 02/15/2012 12:50:32 PM PST by jeffc (Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Once they set up a system wherein other people pay for part of your upkeep, you are no longer a free man. You are obligated to secure their investment. You are basically livestock and your neighbor has a share in you that the government can safeguard in the interests of your neighbor.
Government health care thus diminishes your freedom, in the name of concern for your neighbor’s stake in you.


33 posted on 02/15/2012 1:00:09 PM PST by Lady Lucky ( Exposure to the Son may prevent burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I posted this last week.

Here's the situation in terms that any liberal should be able to understand.

Suppose you only have two restaurants in town, a Pizza Hut and a Kentucky Fried Chicken.

Now suppose that some people want hamburgers, perhaps even employees of the Pizza Hut, so they tell Pizza Hut that they must sell them hamburgers.

Pizza Hut says no, their purpose is to sell pizzas, and that the person must go elsewhere to find hamburgers.

The person says that there isn't another choice for them to conveniently get hamburgers, so Pizza Hut must be forced to sell them hamburgers against its wishes.

The grand compromise is for Pizza Hut to give the people coupons to take to Kentucky Fried Chicken, and then force Kentucky Fried Chicken to sell hamburgers.

-PJ

34 posted on 02/15/2012 1:00:59 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

That might work if Pizza Hut and Kentucky Fried Chicken were not both owned by the same company..PepsiCo.


35 posted on 02/15/2012 1:06:57 PM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

Pepsi sold them to Yum! a few years ago....


36 posted on 02/15/2012 1:24:28 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

(But of course that still leaves your point valid...LOL)


37 posted on 02/15/2012 1:25:14 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

I forgot Yum! bought them thanks.

Yeah and I was being tounge in cheeck a little bit there too but Pizza Hut wouldn’t try to hurt KFC since they both have the same owner.


38 posted on 02/15/2012 1:27:44 PM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

apparently they can according to Dems. The states can according to some “conservatives”.

I say NO WAY


39 posted on 02/15/2012 1:55:24 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

I think New York City already has a team that shows up when 911 is called, just in case, to harvest organs.


40 posted on 02/15/2012 1:56:34 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson