Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police buy plots next to Powell Boys (Please donate to help them pay for it)
MSNBC ^ | MSNBC staff

Posted on 02/15/2012 4:52:57 PM PST by marsh-mellow

A sheriff and his sergeant in Washington state have bought burial plots next to Josh Powell's boys in order to block family members from burying him next to them, according to a media report Wednesday.

"The bottom line is, Josh Powell will not be near those two boys," Pierce County Sheriff's Sgt. Ed Troyer said in an interview with a Seattle-area radio program called the Ron and Don Show.

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: police; powellkids
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2012 4:53:00 PM PST by marsh-mellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marsh-mellow

I understand the sentiment but I’m not at all certain that I’m cool with police interference with private burial arrangements.


2 posted on 02/15/2012 4:59:08 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I agree. I understand the sentiment, but really, in my opinion this amounts to tilting at windmills. What happens with the bodies probably doesn’t matter to the children anymore, they’re in a far better place now.

I know some people are really preoccupied with what happens to bodies, plots, etc. after burial, but I really don’t feel it matters. But hey, I suppose I could be wrong. Maybe the egyptians were on to something...or something.


3 posted on 02/15/2012 5:07:50 PM PST by JDW11235 (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Not sure how they interfered - they are buying burial plots. Would be nice though if these cops are on the young side, and are still around when the boys’ maternal grandparents pass on, and those adjacent plots just might come up for sale.

I heard on the local news that the two boys were so close in life, they buried them in the same casket.


4 posted on 02/15/2012 5:10:45 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Considering these policemen lives have been “interfered” with, leaving them with horrendous nightmares for life of what they experienced due to that fiends actions - I think they deserve a say.

they couldn’t do anything to protect the boys in life, maybe this will help a tiny bit in symbolically protecting them in death.

Until we have walked in their shoes, maybe we shouldn’t be ‘cool’ in any sort of judgment?


5 posted on 02/15/2012 5:13:18 PM PST by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

I don’t think it is about the boys - but the relatives (and now the community) that loved the boys. If somehow their killer was able to get himself buried alongside them.


6 posted on 02/15/2012 5:15:39 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marsh-mellow

I’m sure one of the plots will be used for the mother when she is found.


7 posted on 02/15/2012 5:16:07 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

It’s not even the symbolism that disturbs me, it’s the police interference in a very private matter that in no way pertains to the law or their jurisdiction, that disturbs me.

I might moderate somewhat on that if these plots were not purchased in any official capacity, but by these two acting as private citizens.

It’s still a little much. Dead and gone is dead and gone. The boys are, as you say, in a better place. The disposition of their earthly remains is not a concern of theirs.

Gravesites are largely for the living, to visit and remember. Having the man who killed them right there would be disturbing, yes. It’s for the family to work out. Outsiders really should butt out, imho.


8 posted on 02/15/2012 5:16:36 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

“...in symbolically protecting them in death.”

Nice thought. And a nice gesture on the part of the cops.


9 posted on 02/15/2012 5:17:48 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marsh-mellow

Bury him next to bin Laden - plenty of room.


10 posted on 02/15/2012 5:20:33 PM PST by Glenmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
If I were a family member who was visiting that grave site, I sure would not want to have to be around the murderer's grave. He should be buried off by his lonesome.
11 posted on 02/15/2012 5:32:35 PM PST by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

If the gentlemen bought them as private citizens, that’s fine with me.


12 posted on 02/15/2012 5:42:24 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MamaB

I understand the sentiment of not wanting the father who murdered those two boys buried alongside them. I just don’t like the idea of outsiders interfering to prevent it (law enforcement in particular), if that’s what the family wants. He was, after all, their father, but he killed them. Being back in the public eye can’t be helping matters as far as those surviving family members left to contend with the aftermath.

Suffice it to say, this is already notorious enough that Josh Powell’s grave being vandalized is a possibility no matter where it ends up, if the location is known. Not that I would approve of that, either. Horrendous as they were, his sins are between him and God now. Leave his remains alone, lest you lower yourself to his level in life.


13 posted on 02/15/2012 5:44:57 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marsh-mellow

As a matter of principle, I oppose the notion that we as strangers should interfere in the private burial issues of a family, for whatever reason.

As a matter of conservative principle, I oppose the notion that the public peace officers should be interfering in the private burial issues of a family.

As a practical matter — the dead are dead. None will care. The living are the ones who suffer — and what did the parents of Josh do to deserve punishment by the police? Is it their fault their son committed atrocities? Should their wishes be thwarted because of what their son did?


14 posted on 02/15/2012 5:45:06 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I should have added — if there is a dispute between two sets of grandparents, the father’s and the mother’s, and the police action is to aide the mother’s grandparents, to prevent the father’s grandparents from burying their son next to the boys where the mother’s grandparents will have to see it and remember, that would be a different issue — becuase that would be part of the private matter within the family.

But I haven’t read anywhere else where there is such a dispute. And if there isn’t, there is simply the family of the father, mother, and boys.


15 posted on 02/15/2012 5:50:08 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

It’s also symbolic interference by a governmental agency.

You may begin to think differently once they begin buying up your families burial sites.

Don’t think it can’t be done, it’s already been proven that it can.


16 posted on 02/15/2012 5:56:52 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

His father is unusual, or so it has been reported. I suspect that might be the story behind the story.


17 posted on 02/15/2012 5:57:14 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: skr

According to the article, they used Crimestoppers funds to pay for the plots. They clearly are not acting as private citizens.


18 posted on 02/15/2012 6:05:27 PM PST by PalmettoMason (South Carolinians need to start choosing a primary challenger to Nikki Haley NOW!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marsh-mellow

Josh Powell set up sham residence to mislead authorities before killing sons, self, officials said.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/15/josh-powell-did-not-live-at-home-where-sons-died-in-gas-fueled-explosion/?test=latestnews#ixzz1mVPYLyZ6

Detectives said they believe Powell passed the abandoned home off as his so that he could be granted supervised visits with his sons, Charlie, 7, and Braden, 5. 

“He set it up like a rental place, with pictures of the family,” Sgt. Denny Wood said at the meeting, the newspaper reports. 

“I think it was staged so when CPS (Child Protective Services) came, it would look like a loving family,” he said.


19 posted on 02/15/2012 6:08:54 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh-mellow

Maybe they should just piss on Josh Powell’s body?


20 posted on 02/15/2012 6:11:33 PM PST by rfreedom4u (Just because someone thinks it's a good idea doesn't make it legal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson