Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/16/2012 3:11:08 PM PST by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: katiedidit1

I think he was talking about the EPA.


2 posted on 02/16/2012 3:12:52 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

Yup, Rick. They’re definitely targeting North Dakota first! LOL


4 posted on 02/16/2012 3:15:04 PM PST by TitansAFC (Rick Santorum is the suicide bomber of the 2012 Primary; he's going to take us all out with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

Although he could be right, the MSM will make him look goofy for statements like this. Of course, he could just say “hi” to someone and they’ll try to make him look goofy.


5 posted on 02/16/2012 3:15:46 PM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
The guy is nothing short of bazaar. He has made so many, really moronic statements, that not even he has the time to explain them. The MSM will rip this idiot into confetti for Obama to use in his inaugural parade.
6 posted on 02/16/2012 3:16:26 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
Every state in the union is a potential terrorist target.
9 posted on 02/16/2012 3:20:11 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

I wouldn’t have made that statement on the campaign trail for all sorts of reasons (it’s easy to ridicule, it might give the enemy ideas etc.).

But having said that he may well be right. If I were the terrorists instead of trying to hit the expected targets I’d try to go after someplace rural and unexpected. The goal of terrorism is to terrorize (duh!).

You hit a place like that and no one will feel like they’re safe.


10 posted on 02/16/2012 3:20:35 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

I read it and can find nothing wrong with his statement.

You folks have to realize Obama sounds like an idiot 10 times a day, the media doesnt focus on it and republicans are not good enough at it either.

I assume this is a left wing site because they seem to say he shouldnt support a pipeline if he thinks it might be targeted by terrorists. They see that as a contradiction. I don’t. I see both points as correct.

I swear that if I worked for a republican candidate and if they would let me do it, I could turn countless Obama speeches and comments into major issues.


13 posted on 02/16/2012 3:24:14 PM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
Islamists intend to attack energy infrasctructure. Iran is the biggest exporter of islamist terror on the planet. When Iran is a nuclear power, they'll be a bolder enemy and a more dangerous terrorist threat.

Duh. When did National Review turn into the Washington Post? Oh I know. When WFB made his last, greatest mistake and turned his once proud publication over to the chipmunk.

FUNR.

14 posted on 02/16/2012 3:25:50 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
So ? in the past on Free Republic there have been many articles about North Korea's and Iran's capability of launching a EMP attack on the United States, and you and Newt supporters criticize Rick Santorum for being prepared for terrorist attacks from Iran ?

That stance won't help Newt as a National Security Candidate.

So the Newt supporters criticize Rick Santorum of warning people of a attack from terrorist from Iran who could be already here and see the North Dakota oil production as a potential target.

So what would the Newt supporters have us do ? leave our oil production areas venerable to a terrorist attack ? yeah, really smart.

This is the Newt supporters making hay over nothing.

17 posted on 02/16/2012 3:27:03 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
This is just plain silly.

Santorum needs to learn to stay on message.

Islamic Terrorists are interested in body count above all other things. That's why they call it terrorism instead of sabotage.

Friggin' rookie.

19 posted on 02/16/2012 3:27:37 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

One question....what would Newt’s comments be? Santo is a rookie and is dangerous. This is grown up times. Newt is the only one that understands. For goodness sake he teaches at the war college for the military.


22 posted on 02/16/2012 3:29:29 PM PST by mmanager (Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Well, looky here, another thread blasting Santorum. Just like the thread about CNN cancelling the debate, I see a lot of the same posters.

Would someone please explain what they think is so goofy about his assertion. Thank you.


25 posted on 02/16/2012 3:31:02 PM PST by Girlene (What a bunch of drama queens on this thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

That’s not what Santorum said. That was a biased headline by Romney’s boys at National Review and idiots on the coasts who do not actually understand what is going in North Dakota. Energy is the achilles heel of the US.


31 posted on 02/16/2012 3:35:18 PM PST by Darren McCarty (Rick Santorum in the primary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1




General Presidente Rick "Head Strong" Santorum seized upon the Clapper intelligence report and ordered all women to evacuate North Dakota which he deemed to be on the front line of terrorism.


33 posted on 02/16/2012 3:35:36 PM PST by red flanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

Now the MSM is going to paint him as a nut. That’d be like saying in 2000 that someone would try to fly airplanes into the Pentagon, the WH/Capitol, and the WTC. And of course we know that would never happen, either.


35 posted on 02/16/2012 3:36:07 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
Late on the night of 9/11/01, there was a small refinery fire in Lake Charles, LA, which ultimately proved to be accidental, but people in the area were going nuts thinking they'd just been attacked.

24 hours earlier, people would have ruthlessly mocked anybody that said they could be a potential terrorist target.

39 posted on 02/16/2012 3:37:50 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

All fifty states and all U.S. territories are at risk for terrorist attacks, thanks to all of the illegal immigrants that exist, throughout the fifty states and throughout all U.S. territories!


53 posted on 02/16/2012 3:47:00 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
<---double face-palm!!!
61 posted on 02/16/2012 3:54:28 PM PST by luvie (Never surrender...don't give up. We WILL take our country back, one vote at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1; onyx; All

I’m a Newt supporter, however Santorum is absolutely right about this, energy producing states, especially rural states with lower populations and a higher ratio of law enforcement to that population (meaning fewer officers per 1000 citizens for example) means that terrorists, specifically Iranian terrorist cells very likely have such states and energy producing facilities already on their list of possible targets.

To criticize and condemn Santorum for stating what is a real possibility is not only short sighted, it’s stupid as Hell. The argument about “don’t give the enemy ideas” doesn’t wash because you can bet the rent they came up with the idea a long time ago. Iran has been our enemy since 1978 and they’ve had lots of time to scope out potential U.S. targets both here in this hemisphere and throughout the world.

Our choices come down to four candidates at this point, two of which (Mitt-Witt and Ron “Bradley Manning Is A Patriot” Paul, both of which are (or should be) totally unacceptable to ANY thinking conservative.

That leaves Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum as the conservative alternative to Romney or Paul. I could vote for either one of those gentlemen with a clear conscience, and I think the sniping at either of them should cease right now.


74 posted on 02/16/2012 4:12:09 PM PST by mkjessup (Let's do to Mitt what his Irish Setter did to him while tied to the roof rack of his station wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

It is a lead pipe cinch that the terrorists will attack the North Dakota oil fields, and it remains to be seen if they will be successful.

But they’ll use lawyers.


79 posted on 02/16/2012 4:19:07 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson