[End Times Sentinel]

Folks, JimRob is too nice to put it this way, but if you use FR, and you're not a donor, you're riding in the wagon that other folks are pulling. That's not a Conservative value at all.

We're not talking about a major donation here, $5 a month. How much time do you spend on FR? Isn't that the best deal you've ever run across?

C'mon now, git 'er done, if some ham-n-egger like me can do this (and more) you can too. Donate!

[American Constitutionalist]

So where is Mike Reagan defending his father from Newt's past criticisms of Ronald Reagan ?

There is a video from 1986 of Newt on the house floor in Congress when he publicly criticized the Reagan administration and saying that the Reagan administration has failed , will fail, and will continue to fail.

[Christie at the beach]

Very commonly, you post a negative story about Newt and this one from the Washington Compost. Don't you see that you are helping the lefty media try to smear, to lie and rewrite history. Nancy Reagan said her Ronnie passed the torch to Newt-she was very protective and I think she would prefer Newt even today to fight the radical Obama and his weird group of law breakers. One day, enough people will come to realize that we are fighting a real ideas battle not getting another figure in whom will go along to get along.

[hosepipe]

Reagan was a St.Bernard, Newt is Pit Bull..

Now is the time for a Pit Bull...
Oh! Santo is a Poodle.. Romney is a Chihuahua..

Its true... Sarah is a Grizzly.. Michele Bachmann is some other kind of Bear..
Ron Paul is Feral Dog, and Cain is a fighting Rooster..

American wants a warm and fuzzy lap-dog.. but end up with a Weasel..
Obama is the weaselist weasle that ever weasled..

[Gene Eric]

>> Gingrich: “The Reagan failure was to grossly undervalue the centrality of government as the organizing mechanism for reinforcing societal behavior.”

Ironically a position Santorum is campaigning on today.

Santorum is a statist.

[VinL]

Still another hit piece.

They say Gingrich is dead- but yet, who do they continue to attack? Yesterday, Wash Times ran a story on Newt’s campaign finances based on reports of a Romney lobbying firm; yesterday, a nat’l talk radio host called on him to withdraw; now another 4 page story on how Gingrich is not a Reagan conservative ( how many more times is Romney going to get his lackeys to publish this misinformation?)

Mitt and Rick are the frontrunners- where are the front page hit pieces? No where. They’re reserved solely for the guy in 3rd place.

Today, Wash Post story on Rodney: “Mitt Romney, as a student at a chaotic time for BYU, focused on family, church.”-— What a guy. How touching.

The more they whine, accuse and distort— the more apparent is the fact that Newt is the only anti-establishment candidate in the race.

[musicman]

[NavVet]

Newt has to be for big governemnt. Because only a giant powerful central government could impliment ideas like Newt’s “Mirrors in Space....” Or Moon Base “NEWTron”.

[trebb]

Relentlessly trying to bury our best hope. How about an occasional anti-Romney blurb for “balance”?

[manc]

what is this , more and more hit pieces attacking Newt as the elections near.

PATHETIC.

[Servant of the Cross]

Rehash of already DEBUNKED crap (posting Elliot Abrams got this FReeper banned)

Reagan's Young Lieutenant. Gingrich a star on Reagan team ...

[upsdriver]

Gingrich Archives Show His Public Praise, Private Criticism of Reagan

A good trait of leadership! Criticize in private, praise in public.

[skaterboy]

so newt gets caught cold lying...naw not our newt..but his “he has principals” and “he is forgiven” posses will overlook it

[GVnana]

Strange. This reads much like the completely debunked Elliot Abrams hit piece.

Oh dear. The establishment is worried about Newt Gingrich again.

[narses]

Look at their accomplishments. Newt allied himself with Ronald Reagan to build the Reagan Coalition, the Religious Right, and the Republican majority (together the Reagan Revolution) which directly led the downfall of the Soviet Union, the Contract with America, government reforms, less government, tax cuts, a balanced budget, and the great, long-standing Reagan economy.

Romney, on the other hand, vehemently denied Ronald Reagan and aligned himself with Ted Kennedy and the left. Romney accomplished installing liberal big government programs, defended and promoted Roe v Wade and legalized abortion as “settled law,” advocated and implemented RomneyCare with its liberty killing government mandates against formerly free citizens and its taxpayer funded or subsidized and mandated abortion procedures. He ran and governed to the left of Ted Kennedy on the “gay agenda” resulting in gay marriage in Massachusetts. He appointed liberal judges and liberal appointees throughout his government. Under his “leadership” conservatism and the Republican party was all but destroyed in Massachusetts.

Romney is one evil liberal progressive. No way in hell will MittBots be allowed to support this abortionist, big government, socialist scumbag on FR!

Guess my message isn’t clear enough. I have to keep repeating it and zotting would be MittBots.

79 posted on Sat Dec 03 2011 19:59:37 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) by Jim Robinson

[CatherineofAragon]

So Newt criticized Reagan. So what? Reagan wasn’t divine; he was a human being, and as such, not above criticism. Are you trying to imply that Newt is unfit because every word he spoke about Reagan was less than glowing praise?

Get real.