Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Scott Brown pushes to allow women to serve on front-lines in military combat
masslive.com ^ | February 22, 2012 | Robert Rizzuto

Posted on 02/22/2012 9:44:14 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

WASHINGTON D.C. - Calling for an evolution of policy, Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is asking for changes that would allow women to serve on the front-lines in military combat.

Brown's push comes on the heels of a Department of Defense report calling for changes to the 1994 Direct Ground Combat Definition and Assignment Rule which barred women from certain roles in the military, including front-line ground-combat positions.

The report to Congress concluded that changes were needed so policy doesn't prevent enlisted female military members from rising to their potential. But Brown, in a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, said he believes changes need to go further to level the playing field for women in the military.

"As a 32-year member of the Massachusetts Army National Guard, I believe women should be able to serve in front line positions if they desire. I am mindful of the fact that the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have claimed the lives of 140 women serving as Soldiers, Marines, Sailors and Airmen. Their service was honorable and reflective of the day-to-day reality of modern warfare and the contributions made by female service members," Brown wrote in the letter. "Closing these opportunities to women affect their ability to develop a career path in the military and advance to higher ranks. We have an obligation to expand the professional opportunities available to women, especially considering their sacrifices. Doing so in my view would improve military effectiveness, not detract from it."

The DOD report to Congress on women in the military is centered around a new vision statement calling for removal of "all barriers that would prevent Service members from rising to the highest level of responsibility that their talents and capabilities warrant."

Brown's likely Democratic opponent in the U.S. Senate Race in Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren, said in October that she believes women should be allowed to serve in front-line combat positions.

"I think women should be in combat positions," Warren said at a UMass Lowell debate on Oct. 4. "Frankly, I think that women are just as tough as men and we can make that work."

The revisions recommended in the DOD report would open up to women 13,139 positions in the U.S. Army, 371 in the U.S. Marine Corps and 60 in the Navy. The Air Force already allows women to serve in 99 percent of all positions and was minimally affected by the report's recommendations.

The report stated that significant time and research would precede any changes, a potential delay Brown aid is unacceptable.

"We should not waste time endlessly studying this issue and getting bogged down in bureaucratic red tape," Brown said in his letter. "Those deployed to Afghanistan serving on Female Engagement Teams in support of special operations forces illustrates that the Department can take a more aggressive approach to offering additional opportunities to our women in uniform."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 112th; bhodod; brown4romney; militarywomen; rino; rinobrown; womenincombat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: funfan
Maybe he could send his daughters they seem to be about the right age.

Or at least require them to register for the draft

21 posted on 02/22/2012 10:39:17 PM PST by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bshaw

It’s also a matter of their capability. Only in Hollywood can a 120 pound Angelina Jolie go toe to toe with a 200+ pound bad guy and survive the encounter.


22 posted on 02/22/2012 10:39:47 PM PST by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Chill. As long as Brown votes to repeal Obamacare he’s served his purpose. He can vote for putting women in the front lines all he wants, because if it comes to a vote, it will never pass.


23 posted on 02/22/2012 10:47:24 PM PST by Rufusthered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unkus

You and me both. rereading the article, it appears he only wants them in front line positions “so they can realize their full promotional potential.”

To paraphrase the movie 300:”this is madness!” “madness? This. Is. America!”

FU scott brown you colossal rino.


24 posted on 02/22/2012 10:48:29 PM PST by steel_resolve (Ships With Holes Will Sink And I Will Swim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

In 1977 I saw three telephone company trucks parked in front of a small fast food joint that was under construction. Three employees were installing phone lines. One was a woman. The two men were there to help her carry her ladder. That’s a fact.


25 posted on 02/22/2012 10:50:08 PM PST by Terry Mross (Difference between a conservative / liberal-obvious. Difference between a rep and a dem? None)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

My son in law has just been deployed. My daughter sees the women that are in his unit and says some of them look/act very much like bimbos. I was suprised because I thought that the majority of women who’d be attracted to the military would be tom boy types. On top of the fact that it’s wrong imo to put the weaker sex on the front lines,for one because it blurs the lines of what God intended for our roles to be, I also have the notion that were I an army wife I don’t think I’d care to have my husband thousands of miles away for a year or more, working that closely with the opposite sex. Am I weird for thinking that way?


26 posted on 02/22/2012 10:55:07 PM PST by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

“commander zero” has exceeded our enemies’ wildest expectations. He has surrendered Iraq after we won the war. He has surrendered Afcrapistan while we are winning. Gutted the budget, homos having sex in the showers and now this crap. Morale is at an all time low,we are ripe for an attack and it’s no longer “the few, the proud, the Marines” or “Army of one” but “ , the day will be saved by “Captain Fabulous”.


27 posted on 02/22/2012 10:56:04 PM PST by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

As a veteran and as someone who deals often with current active duty combat troops I will say this. When you are hit and down, you don’t give a rats ass if it is a man or a women that runs out and drags your sorry butt to cover. Some women will fail in combat. Some men do. In the new wars, were is a combat zone? How do you keep any segment of your forces out of harms way?


28 posted on 02/22/2012 11:02:13 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

So youre suggesting a woman could drag a 220 lb man off the field of battle hunh? Ok


29 posted on 02/22/2012 11:37:49 PM PST by steel_resolve (Ships With Holes Will Sink And I Will Swim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: unkus

I think it’s a great idea, that way if we lose a war, we can just say to our conquerers: ‘oh aren’t you tough, you beat a bunch of girls’. =Bill Murray


30 posted on 02/22/2012 11:38:10 PM PST by JPJones (Frodo Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
If about a half dozen women were killed in front line combat in a 90 day period the public would say, "who's hair brained idea was this"?

At which point we'd hear IDIOT Senator Brown say, "I was against before I was for it"

Thank you Senator "BOX of ROCKS" Brown.

31 posted on 02/22/2012 11:43:35 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA; steel_resolve
When you are hit and down, you don’t give a rats ass if it is a man or a women that runs out and drags your sorry butt to cover.

In combat or a house fire, ya want a woman trying to pick you up and carry you or up or down stairs, or a male who is more than capable?

How about trying to pull a 200 pound man up and out through a turret of an armored vehicle?

Don't know about you, but this is a *real* easy choice for me.

32 posted on 02/22/2012 11:49:30 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

What’s next, Scott?

Gonna have the other drops wear fake boobs and fake preggo bellies so they can better understand how women feel in combat?

Stupid idiot.


33 posted on 02/23/2012 12:08:36 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox

Pox: “These unbelievable idiots are living in a Hollywood psychotic fantasy world, IMO.”

Look here, Pox. The well known documentary, Starship Troopers, proves women carry equal weight in front line combat!


34 posted on 02/23/2012 1:15:43 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

“When you are hit and down, you don’t give a rats ass if it is a man or a women that runs out and drags your sorry butt to cover.”

If you are a 200 lb guy with 100 lbs of gear on, it will NOT be a woman who pulls you to cover. Same if you are a 150 lb guy with 100 lbs of gear.

Unless it is a movie. Then a 100 lb gal will carry you back over her shoulder while kickboxing the enemy. While cracking jokes.


35 posted on 02/23/2012 1:27:11 AM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

I’m sure plenty of women exist that can perform just as well as an average man. Women who can do this should not be denied the opportunity if this is what they wish. However, you and I both know, that they will not decide this based on ability. It will become a political thing. The ones who can truly do this will most likely have no problem becoming a fairly cohesive person in the group, but the more girly-girl troops who think they can do it until the s*** hits the fan will most definitely cause major problems as male human nature to protect women asserts itself.


36 posted on 02/23/2012 1:40:29 AM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

This guy is a complete waste!


37 posted on 02/23/2012 2:34:27 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301
The fact is that women can't meet the same standards for men, unless the standards are adjusted downward.

So, I guess this means that women will now have to register for the draft as well?

Haven't heard the feminists clamoring for that.

38 posted on 02/23/2012 2:37:13 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I remember when this bozo got elected. Many Freepers wanted him to run for President for the GOP. Many of them were female Freepers and several men. MA elected just another DEM.


39 posted on 02/23/2012 2:45:55 AM PST by bmwcyle (I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radpolis

“American men have become so emasculated and wussified that every single institution in America is now tainted with the evils of brain dead liberalism, feminism, Marxism and identity politics. Our ancestors would have never tolerated women in combat going back to the dawn of civilization.”

All of our institutions have been destroyed; we are living in Bizarro World, and nothing will revert to the “before times”.


40 posted on 02/23/2012 3:06:17 AM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson