Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women Are Still Being Judged for Not Taking Their Husbands' Last Names
The Atlantic Wire ^ | Jen Doll

Posted on 02/24/2012 3:44:35 PM PST by ConservativeStatement

Right now in the most of the developed world, it could be argued, women are considered about as "equal" to men as they have ever been. And yet, countering any "We've come a long way, baby"-type sentiment you might cheer about (intelligence in a woman is now considered by men to be more important than being pleasant and a good housekeeper; France is doing away with the term "mademoiselle"), there are deep, abiding problems that we're still working through. Some, like birth control access, are matters of health and freedom, while others are more "semantic," though no less problematic.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: marriage; names; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: Krankor
I don’t judge the women who won’t change their names, I judge the wimpy husbands.

I married when I was 30 to a fine Women who was finishing her residency. The hassle and cost to change her name was not worth it. It has worked out well. My Daughter has my name. My wife is listed under my name in the phone book. It has worked out very well. We have our privacy.

Feel free to contact me if you really want to find out if I am a wimp.
21 posted on 02/24/2012 4:07:21 PM PST by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

I think that women who hypenate their names are a pain in the a**. If I married a woman who had a career and a good professional reputation I would ask her to keep her name and not add a hyphen and my name at the end. Betty Grable was always Betty Grable. She did not become Betty Grable James when she married. The worst ones are the princesses with two long last names like Debbie Rabinowitz Gonzalez.


22 posted on 02/24/2012 4:09:38 PM PST by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Taking a man’s last name is not treating a woman as “chattel.” It is the woman honoring the man’s position in the house. If my wife would not take my name, I wouldn’t have married her. I would view that as extreme disrespect. I feel the same way about hyphenated names. ‘Pod.

I do NOT intend to dismiss the notion of taking of the man's name. BUT because of my ancestry searches I keep hitting dead ends because the woman's lineage disappears unless there is special care to record her family.

23 posted on 02/24/2012 4:10:01 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

I teach in an inner city school. We are about a generation (which is only about 15 years in the ghetto) away from inbreeding. Baby daddies don’t give their last names, baby mamas use their last names instead. Why? Because then the baby daddies have to pay child support. This way baby daddy can sell drugs and get cash, and baby mama can still collect our tax dollars. I had two sisters one year that each had two kids before they graduated. Sister A had a baby with Brother A. Sister B had a baby with Brother B. Stay with me now. Sister A then had a baby with Brother B. Sister B had a baby with Brother A. Figure that out. The kids were double half-siblings and double cousins? All four children, although I’m sure there are more than four by now, have their mommies’ last name.


24 posted on 02/24/2012 4:10:01 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

If I didn’t take my husbands last name, I’d have my fathers last name. I love both men, of course in different ways, but it’s still the man’s last name. So how is it suppose to be more “feminist” to keep your maiden name? I thought about doing the maiden name as a middle name, just because I was proud of my family name, but my father said “ you don’t have to do that (I knew that) and your mother likes that your middle name is Marie, as in Mary (we’re Catholic).” My dad also said “you chose your husband, you were stuck with me and your mom!”


25 posted on 02/24/2012 4:10:20 PM PST by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
A man can impregnate 100 women in as many days.

More like 20 days, fewer if they are real hotties.

26 posted on 02/24/2012 4:10:39 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
there are deep, abiding problems that we're still working through. Some, like birth control access, are matters of health and freedom, while others are more "semantic," though no less problematic

I am so sick of all this feminist whining? "deep abiding semantic problems"? This psychosis has caused much unhappiness among women.

27 posted on 02/24/2012 4:10:53 PM PST by oldbrowser (They are Marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul
Nearly every major culture on Earth (with the exception of judiasm and I may be wrong about that) is patrilinial as a fathers birth tended to determine the kids status. Its tradition and its a deep rooted one. There is no need to change it and saying that it makes women “chattel” seems to show a few insecurities on your part. When I get married and have children of my own they will be “douls” to show that I’m their father. The woman gives birth the least you women can do is acknowledge we sired the younglings.

AND my children will be given as much as I can possibly give them to know 'both' sides of their ancestry... GOOD grief, I am the insecure one here????

28 posted on 02/24/2012 4:12:10 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

A woman taking her husband’s name is simply trading one man’s name for another. So, why would anyone calling himself a man would want to have TWO male’s names with a hyphen between them?


29 posted on 02/24/2012 4:13:34 PM PST by fishnuts2 (Liberals are anything but.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

“Anyone who has spent any time searching ‘genealogy’ immediately hits walls for women ancestors. This notion that women are chattel for a man is primeval.”

Sounds like you are an FR Feminista! I have a great idea. If women think they are so smart and independent then do it like most animals do - don’t get married, have children out of wedlock and raise them alone by yourself. Ain’t nature great?

Then you can give them your family name and teach them to hate men, too!


30 posted on 02/24/2012 4:14:25 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
SOmeone I know was trying to prove that his great grandfather was Cherokee.

Turns out his great grandfather knew about the rolls, but being a proud Cherokee refused to sign.

So if your ancestors are not on the rolls then that may be frustrating, but it should be considered an honor.

31 posted on 02/24/2012 4:15:35 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Roger. Wilco, Mr. O’Reilly.


32 posted on 02/24/2012 4:16:18 PM PST by sauropod (You can elect your very own tyranny - Marc Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him ; Male and female created he them ; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. (Genesis 5:1, 2)

God called their name Adam.

So from the very begining, the principle God Himself set is that the woman would take the man's name. Ironically, ALL women have a man's surname, unless they deliberately have it changed to something weird. Wives either take their husband's name at marriage, or they keep their FATHER's name ; unless, as I said, they change their name to Ms. Marijuana, or some other stupid non-name.

But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ ; and the head of the woman is the man ; and the head of Christ is God. (1 Cor. 11:3)

Men and women may rebel against God's order, but not with impunity. It IS GOD'S ORDER.

33 posted on 02/24/2012 4:17:19 PM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode
how do you figure that? i can trace mine back to the 1700's and the ship they came over on...

Ah, I think I said that I can trace a female ancestor to the 1700's. ALLLLLL I can find about HER is HER first name. NOTHING else. Now on some census all that is listed is the first name of females. I personally would like to have more than that. IT has NOTHING to do with taking anything from the almighty males.

34 posted on 02/24/2012 4:17:35 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul

“Nearly every major culture on Earth (with the exception of judiasm and I may be wrong about that) is patrilinial as a fathers birth tended to determine the kids status.”

Orthodox Judaism is patrilineal. Conservative and Reform, not so much.


35 posted on 02/24/2012 4:18:04 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
A disturbing example of the latter is a recent study regarding attitudes about women changing, or not changing, their names after marriage, undertaken by Pennsylvania State University sociologists Laurie Scheuble and David Johnson.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I did not change my name after getting married. I never felt as if I were being “judged”.

I had a professional practice, licenses in 5 states, and a network of professional mentors, friends, and professional organization memberships. It would have been idiocy to change my name, especially having lived in 3 states since being married. It's confusing enough to provide all the paper work needed to change a professional license without add a name change to the mix.

In informal settings those who mistakenly call me by my husband's last name, so what? I graciously accept it.

36 posted on 02/24/2012 4:19:37 PM PST by wintertime (Reforming a government K-12 school is like reforming an abortion center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Sounds like you are an FR Feminista! I have a great idea. If women think they are so smart and independent then do it like most animals do - don’t get married, have children out of wedlock and raise them alone by yourself. Ain’t nature great? Then you can give them your family name and teach them to hate men, too!

IT has NOTHING to do with NOT getting married. Think what you want. AND I never said that I was against the 'taking' of the man's name. However, it sure would be helpful IF the woman's name were recorded for the sake of locating them in the record books.... geeeeeeeze I am the '.....nista?

37 posted on 02/24/2012 4:20:54 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Technically, women don’t have last names. A woman’s name always comes from a man.

Your name is actually your father’s name. Your mother has no name (chattel?).

Your father’s name is his father’s, which came at the expense of his mother, and on and on.

I think that is why many women use their birth surname as their middle name when they marry, for the purposes of the genealogy.

It’s great to be proud of your last name, but it is the last name of a man.


38 posted on 02/24/2012 4:21:00 PM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
I like my father's name.

I honored him by keeping it.

Also, my records are all in that name, not in the name of the man I was married to for 10 years.

Not all civilized societies have a custom of women going through a name change and becoming "Mrs John Smith'--which is the name of the 2nd, 3th, 4th, 5th wife as well, as if they were interchangeable.
39 posted on 02/24/2012 4:21:37 PM PST by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
Pre-nuptual legal agreements.
Separate names (the feminist, btw, retains her FATHER’s name).
Separate bank accounts.
Separate bills and financial affairs.
Identical family roles - well, they're supposed to be identical.
Neuter gender roles.
Children raised in neuter play and role assignments.
Separate living arrangements in some marriages - some on both coasts.
Separate savings.
Separate vacations.

What is the point of ‘modern’ marriage and why would anyone want this kind of mental illness disguised as ‘becoming one?’

My wife would follow me into hell and I'd go there to rescue her. I'm beyond glad that I have a real wife and family.

40 posted on 02/24/2012 4:23:58 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson