Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

One thing interesting. I had a Navy Seal and a Marine tell me basically the same thing. Not word for word but the same sentiment. And they have never met. They told me about a year apart. They said the military and law enforcement does not want military weapons in the hands of civilians for two reasons. One...the kind of people who would buy military assault weapons are the types of people you dont want to have any weapons. Two..the types of people you do want to have weapons, they would never purchase military assault weapons. I understood exactly what they were saying.


54 posted on 02/29/2012 12:09:45 PM PST by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: DallasSun

You are even nuttier and more ignorant than I thought.

You don’t even seem to know what an “assault rifle” is or what makes a “military assault rifle” what it is.

Why would an American choose a Democrat Chief of Police to define the Bill of Rights for his city, unless that weirdo person was a hard core lefty?


56 posted on 02/29/2012 12:14:58 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: DallasSun
They said the military and law enforcement does not want military weapons in the hands of civilians for two reasons.

Please explain to us how a semi-auto version of an AK-47 is a military weapon.

58 posted on 02/29/2012 12:22:11 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson