Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Burton007
I told him, you lose the element of surprise that way.

One who carries openly is probably less likely to be confronted by a criminal than one who carries concealed, because many potential attackers will decide that it's silly to attack when they know they'll encounter armed resistance, when they could simply wait and attack (hopefully) unarmed people after the armed people leave. The person who carries openly may well be at a disadvantage if a criminal decides to attack anyway, but the odds of that occurring may be slight compared with the odds of deterring the attack.

Either course of action could be right or wrong, depending upon the situation.

30 posted on 02/29/2012 9:44:44 PM PST by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

What is wrong with guns in schools?

Works in Israel, Utah and parts of Texas.

This guy made his little part of America safer by being armed.


31 posted on 03/01/2012 7:26:33 AM PST by Geoffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: supercat
Either course of action could be right or wrong, depending upon the situation.

I will go you one further: Occasionally (but not always), ANY course of action could be right, wrong, or indifferent, depending on the situation, or not. Maybe. The results may be unpredictable, or entirely predictable. Or somewhere in between. Usually.

32 posted on 03/01/2012 7:34:42 AM PST by Lazamataz (If unemployment helps the economy, like the W.H. says, then CONTRACTING CANCER MAKES YOU HEALTHIER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson